"..
Unless you've spent the last several years stranded on a deserted island, you've probably heard of at least some of these medical miracles. But here's what you may have missed. ...Each of the above therapies and experiments has involved cells that require no use of embryos."
Is there any counterpoint to this? Does any FReeper respectfully disagree on the merits of these facts?
If not, I continue to be astounded at the bias against the respect for unborn life in the media.
-- Joe
Take a look at this article, it's more condemning:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1151939/posts