Teddy Kennedy, Monty Meehan, Corrine Brown, and a host of other 'rat congress critters think it is just terrible that each soldier does not have an armored vehicle to ride in.
To: Cannoneer No. 4
This is
so true. I think it is also part of the problem that the President's new NASA initiative is having on the Hill. They want to apply some of these new methods hear too. If you think the noise is load now wait until they ask the big contractors to put in some of their own moneies in competitive Science and Technolgy "bake offs." This is happening mpore and more in the large corprate world as well.
Kudos to Rummy, if that is where the honors are due.
To: Cannoneer No. 4
We all knew this was the real reason behind the Get Rummy movement. To congress, the military men and women come dead last.
3 posted on
05/22/2004 9:32:14 AM PDT by
McGavin999
(If Kerry can't deal with the "Republican Attack Machine" how is he going to deal with Al Qaeda)
4 posted on
05/22/2004 9:34:24 AM PDT by
Cannoneer No. 4
(I've lost turret power; I have my nods and my .50. Hooah. I will stay until relieved. White 2 out.)
To: Old Sarge; USMCEODGUY; Poodlebrain; mark502inf; Thunder 6; M1Tanker; SLB; blanknoone; ...
5 posted on
05/22/2004 10:03:08 AM PDT by
Cannoneer No. 4
(I've lost turret power; I have my nods and my .50. Hooah. I will stay until relieved. White 2 out.)
To: centurion316
6 posted on
05/22/2004 10:13:15 AM PDT by
Cannoneer No. 4
(I've lost turret power; I have my nods and my .50. Hooah. I will stay until relieved. White 2 out.)
To: Cannoneer No. 4
How could this possibly be? I thought that Algore completely streamlined the procurement process when he "re-invented" government!
To: Cannoneer No. 4
Which of these is the most important?
reforms threaten defense spending in many Congressional districts, and if that money goes away, it could mean lost elections for the incumbents.
speed up the procurement (which can now take well over a decade) process and make be more responsive to what the troops actually need.
If you are a career politician, the first statement reflects the important realities of life. If you are the soldier, sailor, Marine or airman, the second one is all important.
Building equipment the military does not need or want, interfering in promotions and training, or even specifying how the troops should be trained, have all become a standard part of the military landscape.
Unfortunately this will continue. Our military is subservient to civilian (political) command. Politicians will forever put their own well being above the well being of their military servants. It has been that way for thousands of years and will continue to be that way for thousands more.
8 posted on
05/22/2004 12:34:21 PM PDT by
R. Scott
(Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
To: Cannoneer No. 4
Great article thanks for the ping...All too true. And not just for Defense...the same is true throughout the government . This is why our tax dollars are spent so willy nilly. Layer upon layer of useless paper pushers
13 posted on
05/22/2004 11:49:59 PM PDT by
jnarcus
To: Cannoneer No. 4
"Congressional interference is largely driven by purely political issues (like getting elected, or looking good in the media.)"
If you think little things like obsolete electrical components are the real issue, just wait until the BRAC process gets fired up. This BRAC will be bloody.
To: Cannoneer No. 4
Rumsfeld came to office in January 2001 committed to military reform, including force transformation, manangement reform and reform of procurement.
These are excellent concepts, and for Rummy, presumably represent HIS understanding following a lifetime of reflection on the military after his first term as SecDef in the Ford Administration.
But something happened, and Rummy had to take the Pentagon to war.
This gave Rummy's enemies in the civilian and military bureaucracies a new lease on life.
Rummy has, in my opinion, allowed his battles with Pentagon enemies to obscure his vision of the war. This is of course in part due to Bush's inexplicable unwillingness to expand the armed forces to a size and robustness necessary to fight a world war.
Rummy should have given up all of his visions of transformation on September 12, 2001, and put the Army of now to war, instead of the Army of the future.
17 posted on
05/23/2004 6:12:50 AM PDT by
Jim Noble
(Now you go feed those hogs before they worry themselves into anemia!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson