To: okie01; FairOpinion; Ranger; Allan; Mitchell; TrebleRebel; muawiyah; browardchad; lainie; ...
Check out the Hibri - Bioport info here - the emphasis of the article, despite it's title. Very interesting.
2 posted on
05/19/2004 11:02:24 AM PDT by
Shermy
To: Shermy
To: Shermy
6 posted on
05/19/2004 11:09:24 AM PDT by
Bikers4Bush
(Flood waters rising, heading for more conservative ground. Vote for conservatives!)
To: Shermy
"That's a terrible stretch," says Crowe, who says El-Hibri is straightforward and honest and is one who has "never entertained even the slightest idea of fooling the government" and "bends over backward to make sure the Defense Department is aware." If Crowe were a credible source, instead of a political opportunist, I'd be more comfortable with his assurances.
10 posted on
05/19/2004 11:16:00 AM PDT by
okie01
(www.ArmorforCongress.com...because Congress isn't for the morally halt and the mentally lame.)
To: Shermy
Thanks for the ping--great research as usual, Shermy. Regarding the role of religion you mention in one of your follow-up posts, the way I see it is that the issue is not religion per se but how religion relates to the question of motive; and that is a legitimate law-enforcement question which can and should be handled distinctly from First Amendment issues, IMO.
16 posted on
05/19/2004 11:28:06 AM PDT by
Fedora
(I'm Fedora, and I approved this message before I disapproved it)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson