1 posted on
05/18/2004 6:25:04 PM PDT by
blam
To: blam
Interesting speculation--I think it's simpler:It is inconsistent with our turn over of sovereignty to continue funding one member of the IGC.
To: blam
About time. Chalabi is a toad. Wanting someone else to do his heavy lifting for him. Cowardly slime.
6 posted on
05/18/2004 6:50:11 PM PDT by
PolitBase
To: blam
he will be in the running for president of Iraq soon anyway.
All these finacial ties must be broken.
8 posted on
05/18/2004 6:53:05 PM PDT by
Cold Heat
("We must all, at some time, fight for our right to fart!")
To: blam
Uh.....what would be the sense of continuing payments once Iraq is Soverign? Chalabi will have the opportunity to run for office just like any other Iraqi. It will be entirely up to the Iraqi people if he gets elected or not.
This is all over the fence gossip, like a bunch of little old ladies.
9 posted on
05/18/2004 6:54:41 PM PDT by
McGavin999
(If Kerry can't deal with the "Republican Attack Machine" how is he going to deal with Al Qaeda)
To: blam
Sounds like Chalabi may have been snooping a little to close into the
UN Oil for Food Program for the State Department's comfort!
To: blam
Expect Chalabi to become the best friend of the NY Times henceforth...
13 posted on
05/18/2004 7:14:46 PM PDT by
Antoninus
(Federal Marriage Amendment, NOW!)
To: blam
There is a lot more to the story than there is in this article, much of which appears to be cut from whole cloth.
There are no saints in Iraq, only sinners, but I recommend not taking this article at face value. Its publication is calculated, and is not a straightforward report of facts.
15 posted on
05/20/2004 5:48:58 PM PDT by
Imal
(Revenge is a dish best served often.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson