Posted on 05/18/2004 5:20:47 AM PDT by kattracks
(CNSNews.com) - The Federal Marriage Amendment is dead on arrival in the U.S. Senate -- and President Bush knows it, one homosexual activist said.
Matt Foreman, executive director of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force, blasted President Bush on Monday, after Bush said, "the sacred institution of marriage should not be redefined by a few activist judges."
"I say, Mr. President, you would not be living in the White House but for a 'few activist judges,'" Foreman said in a press release.
Without an independent judiciary, Foreman said, segregation would still be legal; abortion and interracial marriages would still be illegal; and poor people accused of crimes would have no right to legal counsel.
Foreman said the only reason President Bush is urging Congress to act "is to continue to use the lives of committed same-sex couples to divide America for partisan gain."
He also accused President Bush of "sullying" the 50th anniversary of the Brown vs. Board of Education desegregation ruling "by renewing his support for amending the U.S. Constitution to enshrine discrimination against a minority."
The Human Rights Commission, another homosexual advocacy group, accused President Bush of trying to turn the camera away from the nation's foreign policy and economic problems.
"President Bush is attempting to lead this nation into discrimination. We will not let him hurt our families," said HRC President Cheryl Jacques.
In his May 17 statement, President Bush said, "The sacred institution of marriage should not be redefined by a few activist judges. All Americans have a right to be heard in this debate. I called on the Congress to pass, and to send to the states for ratification, an amendment to our Constitution defining and protecting marriage as a union of a man and a woman as husband and wife. The need for that amendment is still urgent, and I repeat that call today."
Jacques said President Bush should "work to unite Americans" rather than using the Constitution to "separate some from the rest."
The Human Rights Campaign says support for passage of the Federal Marriage Amendment has stagnated in the last several weeks.
And, you & your perverted brethren & trying to lead America down the Hershey Highway. We say NO!
Forerly most liberal State Senator in Massachusetts. Her chief of staff lost the seat to a republican over the gay marriage issue.
The President HAS to force Congress to vote on the Amendment this year.
I need some help understanding this. This should have been solved buy enforcement of existing laws but "a few activist judges" who ignore the laws and the constitution are degrading the institution of marriage.
So the reason we're not removing those judges but rather changing the constitution they're ignoring is because.....?
Fags are amazing - this Foreman creature apparently can suck and blow at the same time!
And who is it that is turning this into a big issue as of late?
you could thay that again....
Sounds like "We're queer, we're here, and you HAVE to like it."
For any Homosexual to charge any one else with hypocracy--
is redundency.for those who choose to live a LIE-For whose choice of behavior is against nature itself-and so self
and socially destructive would be humerous had the
"already captured Liberal Establishment and the Press" not
ceded so many victories to the enemy of Othodox Jews and
Christians."My people are destroyed for lack of understanding."
"I say, Mr. President, you would not be living in the White House but for a 'few activist judges,'" Foreman said in a press release.
One more example of how this queer is not living in the real world where he is a heterosexual man in a heterosexual body who wants to act like a homosexual.
Without an independent judiciary, Foreman said, segregation would still be legal; abortion and interracial marriages would still be illegal; and poor people accused of crimes would have no right to legal counsel.
Segregation? It is still legal, as long as you are not a white male trying to keep out someone else. Women and all minority groups can still keep everyone else out of their institutions. Abortion? Murder should be illegal. Interracial marriages? Might be illegal but I doubt it. Poor people and legal counsel? Someone will have to help me on that one.
Foreman said the only reason President Bush is urging Congress to act "is to continue to use the lives of committed same-sex couples to divide America for partisan gain."
I don't think it was President Bush who started this one. If you throw down the gauntlet, you can't be surprised if someone takes up the challenge. He also accused President Bush of "sullying" the 50th anniversary of the Brown vs. Board of Education desegregation ruling "by renewing his support for amending the U.S. Constitution to enshrine discrimination against a minority."
I hope perverts are in the minority and I hope we continue to discriminate against them.
"President Bush is attempting to lead this nation into discrimination. We will not let him hurt our families," said HRC President Cheryl Jacques.
You don't have families, you have mutual admiration groupings that abuse children for your own gain. To have a family, you have to start with a man married to a woman with a lifetime committment.
Jacques said President Bush should "work to unite Americans" rather than using the Constitution to "separate some from the rest."
Oh, that is a good one. The Constitition is used to separate those who want a Republican form of governmen from those who want a Monarchy. Does the stupid statement quoted above still apply? It isn't divisive to call perversion perversion any more than it is divisive to call stupidity stupidity.
The Human Rights Campaign says support for passage of the Federal Marriage Amendment has stagnated in the last several weeks.
Only one way to answer that, FReepers.
Let's Roll
Shalom.
"To have a family, you have to start with a man married to a woman with a lifetime committment."
Then where are the Constitutional Amendments banning divorce and adultery?
Legislatures and executives sans cojones.
Governor Ahnlod can claim "Hey, there was nothing I could do, it was the Mayor of San Francisco who caused the problem."
The Mass Legislature can say, "Hey, continue to vote for me. I tried to stop it. It was the SJC who caused the problem."
The executives and legislatures of the other 49 states can say, "Hey, there was nothing I could do."
But to the queers, they can say, "See, you got what you wanted. Don't vote for my opponent."
Of course, if you lie down with dogs...
Shalom.
Shalom.
You are correct, we should have seen this coming (in fact many did but were laughed out of the discussion) when we liberalized our approach to divorce and sexuality in the 60s. Homosexuality isn't a cause, it's a result. We owe many of today's gays and lesbians an apology that we didn't stop this juggernaut before they could be recruited. But there's no sense crying over spiled milk, as they say.
Shalom.
"Sans cojones" is right. I just can't help but thinking that even if we changed the constitution, those activist judges would find that the change itself was 'unconstitutional'.
"Activists Blast President Bush for Hypocrisy" ... First, degenerates aren't exactly a reliable rouce to define someone else's hypocrisy. Second, if the degenerates are mad at our President, then he must be on the right track!
The media is having a video blackout of homosexuals kissing in the courthouse. Notice how the only pictures are not inclueding the freashow marriages. In fact the only video they show is of two men in suits and anther two holding a baby boy.
Kerry supports homosexual marriages. He has a 100% voting record for the HRC. Bluntly a vote for the Democrat party is a vote to homosexualize children. A bit extreme but with groups like GlSEN in the public schools, very true.
Homosexuals are trying to spin the issue as DOA just as democrats have called every budge DOA.
They rail against recess appointments but have been bypassed.
The problem in the senate is the fact that republicans think they are in a country club and need to be polite. They are fools. This is a political blood sport and they need to make this public and exposed. They need the force the alchoholic ted kenedy to take a stand, they need to force John F'n Kerry to side with the homosexuals.
It should also be noted that this is not a negative ban on homosexuals it is an affirmative statment of what marriage is defined. FMA does not evenvision every wacko variation of a "marriage" it simply says marriage is this and kicks the rest back to the states. (where the issue belongs.)
This is an albatross we need to hang around the neck of every little and big democrat candidate this season.
IOW:
"Democrat? I didn't know you were a homosexual..."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.