Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Saddam-9/11 Link Confirmed
FrontPageMagazine.com ^ | 5/11/04 | Laurie Mylroie

Posted on 05/11/2004 7:13:09 AM PDT by TrebleRebel

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 last
To: Defender2
Thanks D2!!
Ms.B
61 posted on 05/11/2004 11:19:53 PM PDT by MS.BEHAVIN (Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds. Re-elect G.W.Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: MS.BEHAVIN
Your Welcome, MS.BEHAVIN


!!!!:-)

D2
62 posted on 05/11/2004 11:21:03 PM PDT by Defender2 (Defending Our Bill of Rights, Our Constitution, Our Country and Our Freedom!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Defender2
Thanks for the ping!
63 posted on 05/12/2004 1:15:41 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Qwinn
Did you read your Freep mail?
64 posted on 05/12/2004 7:12:08 PM PDT by Shepster (Hook 'em Horns!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Shepster
Yes. You have a reply.

Qwinn
65 posted on 05/12/2004 7:18:27 PM PDT by Qwinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Qwinn
So do you.
66 posted on 05/12/2004 8:35:20 PM PDT by Shepster (Hook 'em Horns!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Peach

Thanks for posting the websites. Appreciate it.


67 posted on 05/14/2004 3:11:54 PM PDT by patriciaruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: muleskinner
is a notation in an appointment book good enough evidence for an indictment/conviction?

I can't answer the indictment question, as I have little criminal experience, but as far as conviction, the notation might be hearsay, and thus inadmissible. It depends on who allegedly made the notation and perhaps several other things. If it gets entered, it can be weight with all the other evidence.

But we aren't really talking about a court of law that's based on justice and protecting the rights of innocents. We are talking about war where there is no specific burden of proof. What coroboration is there for the event in question? Is there another, reasonable, explanation for the existence of that evidence outside complicity? How likely is that explanation compared to the complicit one? Questions like these determine the value of intelligence.

68 posted on 05/14/2004 3:23:27 PM PDT by 1L
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: KingofQue

The Czech connection was just one of a few overt pieces of intel. A far more important one was a hand written note, that both speaks to the Yellow Cake issue and the AQ/Iraq tie to 9/11:

Written in the neat, precise hand of Tahir Jalil Habbush al-Tikriti, the former head of the Iraqi Intelligence Service (IIS) and one of the few named in the US government's pack of cards of most-wanted Iraqis not to have been apprehended, the personal memo to Saddam is signed by Habbush in distinctive green ink.

Headed simply "Intelligence Items", and dated July 1, 2001, it is addressed: "To the President of the Ba'ath Revolution Party and President of the Republic, may God protect you."

The first paragraph states that "Mohammed Atta, an Egyptian national, came with Abu Ammer (an Arabic nom-de-guerre - his real identity is unknown) and we hosted him in Abu Nidal's house at al-Dora under our direct supervision.

"We arranged a work programme for him for three days with a team dedicated to working with him . . . He displayed extraordinary effort and showed a firm commitment to lead the team which will be responsible for attacking the targets that we have agreed to destroy."

There is nothing in the document that provides any clue to the identity of the "targets", although Iraqi officials say it is a coded reference to the September 11 attacks.

The second item contains a report of how Iraqi intelligence, helped by "a small team from the al-Qaeda organisation", arranged for an (unspecified) shipment from Niger to reach Baghdad by way of Libya and Syria.

http://www.frontpagemag.com/articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=11313

DK


69 posted on 05/14/2004 3:44:17 PM PDT by Dark Knight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Dark Knight; KingofQue
That memo is not believable. According to it, Atta didn't just meet with an Iraqi spymaster in Europe, he travelled to Baghdad itself in order to be personally trained by Abu Nidal, as late as mid-2001. Oh, and by the way, the uranium from Niger arrived - and Al Qaeda helped us get it!

There is supposed to be a market in Iraq for forged regime documents. But I would go further and say that this one looks like an elaborate set-up. Consider the timing: it's released to the world on the eve of Saddam's capture. The journalist is Con Coughlin, previously accused of being a channel for disinformation from Britain's MI6 agency. It's touted as authentic by Ayad Allawi, who is not from Chalabi's much-criticised INC, but from the CIA's favorite, the INA.

So I surmise that this is in fact part of the campaign against an Iraq/AQ connection. But instead of casting doubt on the evidence (as was done with Atta's visit to Prague), here they're telling people what they want to hear, in spades... so that later, when the story is discredited, the idea of a connection will have even less traction. "Once bitten, twice shy."

70 posted on 05/16/2004 1:24:55 AM PDT by apokatastasis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: TrebleRebel

When i see Dan Rather report it...then i'll believe it...uh yeah...ok...


71 posted on 05/16/2004 1:36:00 AM PDT by teldon30
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: apokatastasis

It's like the Czech intel about Atta, the plane used for terrorist training, Abu Abbas and Abu Nidal in Bagdad, the Kay report acknowledging a far greater terrorist presence in Iraq than anyone ever thought, etc.

How much evidence is enough? VX gas in Jordan as an AQ plot to kill tens of thousands, VX probably from Iraq, the accepted 200 tons of yellow cake Saddam aquired prior to the Wilson fake yellow cake trip (he's got a company dealing in gold from Niger).

As for being released on the eve of Saddams capture, did we know we were going to find him in that hole? From all accounts actually finding him was a fluke.

DK


72 posted on 05/16/2004 2:51:30 PM PDT by Dark Knight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Dark Knight
I think Iraq was behind 9/11. But I also think that memo's too good to be true. Maybe I'm wrong about that. Maybe I should take Ayad Allawi at his word when he says it's "the most compelling piece of evidence that we have found so far". I will reserve judgment until I have more to go on.

True or false, I don't think the story's timing can possibly be coincidental. It appears to have come out on the very day of Saddam's capture. And finding him was not a fluke, it was the result of hard work. The Abu Ghraib interrogations might even be what cracked the case - apparently most of them happened between October and December 2003.

If it really was VX in Jordan, that's interesting, because it was also supposed to be VX at the Sudanese "aspirin factory" which Clinton bombed in 1998.

73 posted on 05/17/2004 2:08:26 AM PDT by apokatastasis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Peach
This all raises the question, Iraq involved in 9/11, what did France, Germany, and Russia all know?

This seems to be the main reason why so many liberals and the UN and these nations have done their best at keeping the water muddy.

What did the Clintons and their administration know, they sure did everything they could to maintain that UN "Oil for Rotten Food" program.

Under an algore administration US would have been under their World Court treating terrorist as a criminal matter. There seems to be little doubt that Saddam would still be in power as the economic base for France, Russia and Germany.
74 posted on 05/17/2004 2:44:45 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson