Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Some dare call it treason
WorldNetDaily ^ | May 4, 2004 | Jack Cashill

Posted on 05/04/2004 4:46:55 AM PDT by BobKeyser

Some dare call it treason

By Jack Cashill © 2004 WorldNetDaily.com

No American had more sway over Clinton administration foreign policy than Loral honcho Bernard "Bernie" Schwartz. His money spoke with such clarity that, in early February 1996, the White House dispatched Ron Brown to collect a major chunk of it in person. No doubt, Schwartz could have mailed it in. But by sending a Cabinet member, the White House signaled both its respect for Schwartz and its recognition of his intent, namely to secure waiver approval for Loral's satellite launches.

In return for staying "on board" Brown's sinking ship, his confidante Nolanda Hill, who had also been targeted by Brown's independent counsel, insisted on being apprised of any action that might threaten her freedom. Brown welcomed a second opinion. On his February trip to New York to see Schwartz, he needed one.

The meeting was brief and to the point. Hill met with Brown immediately afterward. Still reeling, Brown showed her the two checks Schwartz had given him. Hill could not believe what she was seeing. Combined, they totaled $1.2 million. Hill does not "think" the total was $1.2 million, she "knows" it was and told the Justice Department as much in a pre-sentencing interview.

The checks must have unnerved even the Democratic National Committee, as they were never logged in. Still, Schwartz got his point across, and before this election cycle was over, he would officially donate more than $630,000 in soft money to the DNC – 50 times what he had given in the last presidential election. No Democrat gave more.

In February 1996, Schwartz's money mattered. The Clintons were just beginning to smell victory. To secure it, they had to continue feeding the TV beast. They had fully ignored all Federal Election Commission restrictions and were using soft money as though it were hard.

Much to Schwartz's frustration, however, the Pentagon was standing firm on the question of commercial satellites. Given the vital technology contained therein, much of it secret, the military had convinced Secretary of State Warren Christopher to keep the satellites on the so-called ''munitions list,'' an inventory of the nation's most sensitive military and intelligence-gathering equipment.

Almost immediately, Deputy National Security Adviser Sandy Berger had begun plotting to undermine Christopher. In November 1995, Berger sent a memo to Christopher's deputy and long time Clinton buddy, Strobe Talbott. Berger claimed that Ron Brown, who "was far more sympathetic to the satellite makers," would appeal Christopher's ruling to Clinton. Berger was clearly setting Brown up for the fall, should there ever be one.

Still, despite Berger's machinations, the serious professionals within the National Security Agency, State and Defense were resisting the wholesale transfer of licensing authority for these satellites to the Commerce Department. Once moved to Commerce, the military feared it would lose veto power over exports. In time, Berger would justify their fears as he eventually finessed control to the Commerce Department.

Nolanda Hill was appalled. For all the compromises of her Washington life, she retained her red-blooded Texan vigor. She loved her country, warts and all, and damned if she didn't know where those warts were. What Brown and Schwartz were doing was treasonous, she thought, and said so in no uncertain terms.

Just a week or so after Brown's New York meeting with Schwartz, a Chinese Long March 3B rocket carrying the Loral-built Intelsat 708 satellite crashed just after liftoff and killed or injured at least 60 people in a nearby village. This was the third Long March failure in the last three years involving U.S.-built satellite payloads.

Confident of his relationship with the president, Schwartz up and dispatched a Loral-led review team to China to assess the failure of the rocket and suggest refinements. The Cox Committee would later describe Schwartz's actions as "an unlicensed defense service for the People's Republic of China that resulted in the improvement of the reliability of the PRC's military rockets and ballistic missiles."

So serious was the offense that in 1998 the Criminal Division of the Justice Department launched an investigation. Incredibly, while the investigation was in process, Berger, now national security adviser, sent a memo to the president urging him to "waive the legislative restriction on the export to China of the communications satellites and related equipment for the Space Systems /Loral (SS/L) Chinasat 8 project."

This waiver would present a huge problem for the prosecution. Berger admitted as much: "Justice believes that a jury would not convict once it learned that the president had found SS/L's Chinasat 8 project to be in the national interest." But Berger was not about to let that stop him: "We will take the firm position that this waiver does not exonerate or in any way prejudge SS/L with respect to its prior unauthorized transfers to China." Berger was blowing smoke, and he knew it. A waiver would make prosecution all but impossible. Under pressure from Schwartz, the president approved the waiver, and the prosecution came to naught.

This story merits its own book, but what deserves immediate comment is the willingness of the Clintons to risk everything to keep the cash pipeline open. Schwartz kept it open and full. Before he was through, Schwartz and Loral would donate roughly $2 million to the Clinton cause. Whether Schwartz gave additional money or favors off the books is a question that deserves asking.

A second question that deserves asking is just how much damage Schwartz, Berger and the Clintons did to America's national security.

A third question worth asking is whether Ron Brown's very real threats to expose these machinations led to his death.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jack Cashill is an Emmy-award winning independent writer and producer with a Ph.D. in American Studies from Purdue.

IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF THE MEDIA AND WOULD LIKE TO SCHEDULE AN INTERVIEW WITH JACK CASHILL, PLEASE EMAIL BOB KEYSER AT rkeyser5@nycap.rr.com


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bernardschwartz; bernieschwartz; chinagate; jackcashill; loral; ronbrown; sandyberger
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

1 posted on 05/04/2004 4:46:56 AM PDT by BobKeyser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BobKeyser
The REAL purpose in the Democrat National Committee puppet Jamie Gorelick's "Wall" was to keep any meaningful investigation into the hundreds of millions of dollars flowing from the Chinese military into the coffers of the rat party, in return for the crown jewels of our nation's missle and nuclear secrets.
2 posted on 05/04/2004 4:54:24 AM PDT by FormerACLUmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BobKeyser
Billy boy and his tuna should be behind bars, should have been long ago.
3 posted on 05/04/2004 5:10:20 AM PDT by SMARTY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember
Not even with our National Security at risk will the impotent Republicans stand up for Americans put in danger by the Clintons and their friends.
4 posted on 05/04/2004 5:17:32 AM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BobKeyser; Archangelsk; Aeronaut
Cashill is a crank who has made a career of making outrageous claims about air crashes. He is currently pimping a book on "the murder of Ron Brown."

The Ron Brown accident is featured in two of Tony Kern's books on airmanship, and the way his flight was flown is used as a lesson in how not to do things by air training institutions across America. No experienced aviator who has looked at these secondary sources, let alonge the 51-3 which is pretty darn scathing, believes that Ron Brown was killed by anything except just plain bad judgment -- in the cockpit, and in the command of that squadron and wing.

Or as FReeper Archangelsk puts it, "Don't be flyin' a two-NDB approach with one ADF." (To the non-pilots, what they did is kinda like driving down the highway blindfolded and trying to guess your exit! In a jet in the mountains, in crummy weather, that is an exceedingly bad idea).

Now, Brown may be crooked as ninety miles of Irish back road. Heh. Given that he was in Clinton's "Most Ethical Administration in History" he probably was, and I wish Jack Cashill luck in exposing Brown's criminality. But my experience with Cashill tells me he's one of those guys in the press that never lets the facts interfere with a good tale.

I won't be able to post again for a while -- duty calls -- but I'm sure Aeronaut can find somebody who's read Tony's books, or the many articles on this accident in the technical press, and can adequately answer technical questions on it.

d.o.l.

Criminal Number 18F
5 posted on 05/04/2004 5:24:20 AM PDT by Criminal Number 18F (Lesson: don't hit the ground. It hurts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BobKeyser
Outstanding post. Thanks.
6 posted on 05/04/2004 5:24:31 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun
The rat party is clearly the enemy of the United Stataes and must be obviously destroyed.

As for impotent RINOs like the vomitous 9-11 head Kean? Well guess what. They are also our enemies.

7 posted on 05/04/2004 5:24:42 AM PDT by FormerACLUmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Criminal Number 18F
Thanks for your service.
8 posted on 05/04/2004 5:28:12 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BobKeyser
Some dare call it treason...none dare call it reason.
9 posted on 05/04/2004 5:29:24 AM PDT by liberallarry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember
The question that I have always wanted to hear answered was, "How much money did the ChiComs pay the First Pervert for this technical help?"

The technical aid that the ChiComs received from Loral (with the First Pervert's concurrence) was worth tens of thousand of technical and scientific man hours of labor. As such, it was worth at least a hundred million dollars. One wonders in which off shore bank it is tucked away?

This is one of the biggest scandals in American history.

10 posted on 05/04/2004 5:29:50 AM PDT by Citizen Tom Paine (The truth will out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Criminal Number 18F; Tijeras_Slim; FireTrack; Pukin Dog; citabria; B Knotts; kilowhskey; ...

11 posted on 05/04/2004 5:30:53 AM PDT by Aeronaut (Failure is not an option - its built into the software.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun
"Not even with our National Security at risk will the impotent Republicans stand up for Americans put in danger by the Clintons and their friends."

Thank you Trent Lott, and the rest of the gutless druts we call senators!

Semper Fi,
12 posted on 05/04/2004 5:32:08 AM PDT by 2nd Bn, 11th Mar (Sniper: "One shot, one kill". Machinegunner: "One shot, one kill...again, & again & again".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Criminal Number 18F
Cashill may or may not be "unreliable." That's irrelevant. The article is about Bernie Schwartz, Loral and the unwarranted release of technology that helps a potential enemy target us with nukes. If there are false claims in the arguments presented in this article, those are what we need to see refuted.
13 posted on 05/04/2004 5:35:04 AM PDT by T'wit ("To educate a man in mind and not in morals is to educate a menace to society" - Theodore Roosevelt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BobKeyser
This is old news. Nothing to see here. Move along.

What is the statute of limitations on treason?

14 posted on 05/04/2004 5:36:04 AM PDT by Former Proud Canadian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Criminal Number 18F
May God be with you.
15 posted on 05/04/2004 5:40:26 AM PDT by MEG33 (John Kerry's been AWOL for two decades on issues of National Security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BobKeyser
"Secretary of State Warren Christopher"

The most terrible SOS in living memory.
16 posted on 05/04/2004 5:45:45 AM PDT by Bahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Criminal Number 18F
Thank you for your service to our country. Stay safe.
17 posted on 05/04/2004 5:47:42 AM PDT by Bahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Criminal Number 18F
I know Jack Cashill in real life. He is not a crank by any definition. Living in TWA country gives Jack (and many others) a different perspective on the crash of TWA Flight 800 and the subsequent government coverup. Jack is a tiger for the truth who uses his training as a journalist to investigate, interview, and examine for the underlying facts.
18 posted on 05/04/2004 5:52:36 AM PDT by KCrouch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun
"Not even with our National Security at risk will the impotent Republicans stand up for Americans put in danger by the Clintons and their friends."

BINGO!

Does anyone know, WHY?

Was it the FBI Files?

If, this isn't TREASON, then treason doesn't exist.

19 posted on 05/04/2004 5:53:28 AM PDT by auggy (http://home.bellsouth.net/p/PWP-DownhomeKY /// Check out My USA Photo album & Fat Files)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Tom Paine
Not to change the subject but I do think the Oil For Food UN debacle will have ties to the top dems. A close watch is needed. Kofi just threw up a wall sounding much like this one.
20 posted on 05/04/2004 5:56:39 AM PDT by wingnuts'nbolts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson