Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Uber Kook, Patriot movement nutcase whackjob. I'm sure all of his followers are busy plotting overthrows of the government tonite. LOL
1 posted on 04/30/2004 7:39:04 PM PDT by Central Scrutiniser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Central Scrutiniser
Simkanin, 59, told U.S. District Judge John McBryde that after spending thousands of hours studying federal tax laws, the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, he concluded that he did not agree with the tax laws.

Well that settles it then. Why did they even need a trial?

2 posted on 04/30/2004 7:47:34 PM PDT by John Thornton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Central Scrutiniser
Oh, no!! A sheeple that thinks for himself! Put him out of his misery!

Look, at the risk of being called a whackjob myself, I've read case law, constitution, books by former IRS agents, and their (the fedral gubmint's)story doesn't match reality. When, when, when are people going to stand up to this financial tyranny and stop defending the IRS and it unethical and unconstitutional laws. Am I the only one who has heard, seen, and participated in shoving it to the IRS? They are a joke!

5 posted on 04/30/2004 7:52:20 PM PDT by natewill (Start the revolution NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Central Scrutiniser
All he needs is a pardon from GWB. Kinda like the Rich pardon only smaller.

That will get the unwashed lathered up.
14 posted on 04/30/2004 8:04:03 PM PDT by katz (Defend parental choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Central Scrutiniser
He could have just used all the loopholes that are available and not paid anything in taxes anyways. And I read James 5:4 just the other night... his interpretation is nuts.

I agree the IRS should be destroyed and that there are questions over the ratification of the 16th Amendment. But until enough people even wake up to figuring that part out there is little chance of breaking it up.

Fed Judges in particular are there to protect the govt, NOT YOU.

17 posted on 04/30/2004 8:08:35 PM PDT by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Central Scrutiniser
He can imagine the clear meaning of the law doesn't say what it says, it ought to be easy to imagine his stay in prision is simply a long vacation to a spa.
32 posted on 04/30/2004 8:31:15 PM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Central Scrutiniser
He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people, and eat out their substance.
55 posted on 04/30/2004 9:01:24 PM PDT by AdamSelene235
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Anyone know what his logon name is?

64 posted on 04/30/2004 9:15:33 PM PDT by Cultural Jihad (x = x + 1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Central Scrutiniser
Seven years, huh?

Great. I guess he can throw all his old tax forms out and start fresh when he gets out of jail.

You only are required to keep 7-yrs worth correct?
95 posted on 04/30/2004 11:09:52 PM PDT by Chewbacca (I think I will stay single. Getting married is just so 'gay'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Central Scrutiniser
This isn't such a funny letter to me. There was a note taped to my door two days ago from a "Revenue Compliance Officer" ordering me to call him at once. I called the number and left him a message. Today the guy came to my house an pompously began to rattle off the things that I'm going to need to prepare for his review.

I was livid. First, I paid tens of thousands in taxes last year - and that's before you count gasoline tax, utility tax, telephone tax, travel tax, sales tax, vehicle registration, etc. So I stopped the guy from rambling long enough to say, "I pay enough as it is. If you guys want to rob me for more you're going to have to work for it, because I'm damned sure not going to help you do it." He then told me that I needed to listen and comply for my own sake. I followed that up by telling him that he needed to get the hell out of my foyer for his own sake.

I don't doubt that I've opened the floodgates of hell on myself, but I couldn't resist. They confiscate way too much as it is, then this guy expects me to fall at his feet when he shows up. I'm glad that he left because I was too the point that I wanted to twist his head off. I figured that a refusal to cooperate was better than assault or manslaughter.
96 posted on 05/01/2004 12:27:54 AM PDT by Jaysun (I won't be happy until they put cream cheese in a spray can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Central Scrutiniser
"We're going to have chaos in this country if individual citizens are allowed to decide unilaterally which laws are constitutional and which aren't," Assistant U.S. Attorney David Jarvis said. "The sentence for Mr. Simkanin was quite severe and appropriate."

Excellent point, your majesty. May I suggest that you next sentence the Mayor and Justices of the Peace of San Francisco to seven years in jail. You can then move on to the County Supervisors in Portland, Oregon. After all in flaunting clear state laws on marraige to advance their personal gay agenda they were unilaterallyl deciding which laws are constitutional.

Oh, nothing is happening to them? It's not a double standard or politically motivated prosecution, is it?

97 posted on 05/01/2004 8:16:02 AM PDT by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Central Scrutiniser
"He and those who share his views have a cultlike belief that laws that are generally accepted by citizens of the United States are not applicable to them," McBryde said

Is the Judge saying that tax law is based on the principle that "Acquiescence is acceptance"?

106 posted on 05/01/2004 12:10:37 PM PDT by paleocon patriarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Central Scrutiniser
This guy is nuts, but . . .

In explaining the tough sentence, McBryde cited Simkanin's history of radical anti-government beliefs and his "contempt and disrespect" for the federal government and the federal courts.

I guess a history of beliefs now qualifies as a hate crime!

119 posted on 05/01/2004 11:55:05 PM PDT by An.American.Expatriate (A vote for JF'nK is a vote for Peace in our Time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson