Posted on 04/26/2004 11:20:17 AM PDT by pookie18
Free market conservatives often voice frustration that in most elections voters see little ideological difference between the candidates — especially in primary races. As Kellyanne Conway of the polling company has put it, too often conservative voters are forced to choose between "vanilla and French vanilla."
Not so in Pennsylvania's primary election for Senate on Tuesday. Here voters have a choice between vanilla and chocolate-fudge brownie. The contrasts in the voting records of incumbent Arlen Specter and challenger Pat Toomey could hardly be more stark. To highlight those distinctions, I constructed a list below of the clarifying differences between what these two candidates stand for.
Toomey Specter National Taxpayers Union Rating Grade A Grade C+ Supports School choice for parents Yes No Position on Bush tax cut Make it much bigger Make it much smaller Medical Malpractice reform Yes No Trial Lawyer Campaign Support close to 0 $1.3 million # of Votes for Higher Taxes 0 6 Citizens Against Govt Waste A Rating Porker of the Year Amer. Conservative Union Rating 96 43 Support for Free Trade Yes Sometimes Taxpayer funds for abortions No Yes Support National Endowment for Arts No Yes Voted on $530 Medicare Drug Bill No Yes Private Accounts For Social Security Yes Depends on when he's asked Farm Subsidies No Yes
In sum, fiscal conservatives finally have a race where there is no just a dime's worth of difference, but hundreds of billions of dollars worth.
Polls show that more than 1/3rd of self-professed conservatives in Pennsylvania are leaning toward voting for Arlen Specter. This is like an oak tree voting for a chainsaw. If conservatives do vote for Specter, they may be suffering from buyer's remorse for the next six long years.
Not so in Pennsylvania's primary election for Senate on Tuesday. Here voters have a choice between vanilla and chocolate-fudge brownie. The contrasts in the voting records of incumbent Arlen Specter and challenger Pat Toomey could hardly be more stark. To highlight those distinctions, I constructed a list below of the clarifying differences between what these two candidates stand for.
Toomey Specter National Taxpayers Union Rating Grade A Grade C+ Supports School choice for parents Yes No Position on Bush tax cut Make it much bigger Make it much smaller Medical Malpractice reform Yes No Trial Lawyer Campaign Support close to 0 $1.3 million # of Votes for Higher Taxes 0 6 Citizens Against Govt Waste A Rating Porker of the Year Amer. Conservative Union Rating 96 43 Support for Free Trade Yes Sometimes Taxpayer funds for abortions No Yes Support National Endowment for Arts No Yes Voted on $530 Medicare Drug Bill No Yes Private Accounts For Social Security Yes Depends on when he's asked Farm Subsidies No Yes
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.