To: MEG33
He just can't help but slip and slide with his answers.
Do you think some Democrats are having buyers' remorse over his nomination?
To: Erik Latranyi
I will ping you to a Broder column.
7 posted on
04/25/2004 4:21:44 AM PDT by
MEG33
(John Kerry's been AWOL for two decades on issues of National Security!)
To: Erik Latranyi
I can't help but think so. Remember just when Dean was imploding? The polls showed Kerry was electable and, as the most liberal of the remainder of the credentialed pack, all the most liberal hog farmers in Iowa decided to try it . . . and the rest of the Democrats everywhere took note and followed like lemmings.
I can't help but wonder if Dean was a stalking horse for Kerry. Wasn't most of his money and early lead from internet donations from the likes of Kool-Aid drinking websites such as DU and MoveOn.Org? I smell Soros on both the rise and timely fall of Howard Deaan.
11 posted on
04/25/2004 4:37:44 AM PDT by
Vigilanteman
(crime would drop like a sprung trapdoor if we brought back good old-fashioned hangings)
To: Erik Latranyi
We really won't know how bad the buyer's remorse is until the Democrats have a chance to move the primaries back to the spring and early summer, and whether they take advantage of it. Terry McCauliffe wanted the process early, so the presumptive candidate could spend several months taking shots at the President.
Nobody in the DNC expected that the presumptive candidate would spend more time reloading, so he could shoot himself in the other foot.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson