1 posted on
04/12/2004 9:44:53 AM PDT by
kattracks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
To: kattracks
Wowzers....wonder if Ms. G. is feeling the burn...
To: kattracks
Things that make you go "Hmmm..."
3 posted on
04/12/2004 9:47:42 AM PDT by
Tuxedo
(Zed's Dead....)
To: kattracks
Another brick in the load ........
4 posted on
04/12/2004 9:48:33 AM PDT by
abc1
To: kattracks
WOW-BUMP!
5 posted on
04/12/2004 9:49:59 AM PDT by
lucyblue
To: kattracks; Dog; Cap Huff; Ragtime Cowgirl; NormsRevenge; Grampa Dave; BOBTHENAILER; blam; Howlin
This commission has been infiltrated with those who have a stake... or a behind to protect!
6 posted on
04/12/2004 9:50:49 AM PDT by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(The terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States - and war is what they got!!!!)
To: kattracks
will any of the Republican committee members go here during Freeh's testimony? I won't hold my breath.
7 posted on
04/12/2004 9:51:04 AM PDT by
oceanview
To: kattracks
If the media will cover this, Gorelick will have a bad week. Unfortunately, the only place you will see this is on FR and Newsmax.
8 posted on
04/12/2004 9:51:53 AM PDT by
The South Texan
(The Democrat Party and the leftist (ABCCBSNBCCNN NYLATIMES)media are a criminal enterprise!)
To: kattracks
Hmmmm, the 9-11 Commission comes under suspicion for endangering the country. Wonder if the commissioners are going to be questioned?
11 posted on
04/12/2004 9:54:26 AM PDT by
McGavin999
(Evil thrives when good men do nothing.)
To: kattracks
Gorelick should not be on the commission. She is a partisan political hack! And should be fired from the commission.
For that matter, George Stephanopolous should should not be on ABC acting like a journalist. He is a partisan political hack! And should be fired.
Neither one of these things will happen.
14 posted on
04/12/2004 9:54:48 AM PDT by
isthisnickcool
(I'm isthisnickcool, and I approved this post!)
To: kattracks
When questioning Ms Rice, Goerlick looked like a vacuous grinning maneqin. Though trying to shift the blame for 9/11 to the Bush administration from her own, you could see that she wasn't even buying her own baloney.
To: kattracks
former FBI Director Louis Freeh revealed on Monday, suggesting that Gorelick did little to remedy the situation
If it weren't for the fact that our National Security, sovereignty and survival are at stake, all these finger pointing would be funny.
I still remember reading the summer of 2000 Congressional Joint Intelligence Committee report. It spoke of various terrorist threats and organizations and persons. Congress knew, even then that al-Qaeda/bin Laden was just one of the potential problems.
All this fingerpointing and blamegame is idiotic. It's all bluster. Not much will come of it. It is all a political game.
16 posted on
04/12/2004 9:55:00 AM PDT by
TomGuy
(Clintonites have such good hind-sight because they had their heads up their hind-ends 8 years.)
To: kattracks
Its' a no-brainer that she should NOT be on this commission. Who appointed her? And how did her appointment get through? What is wrong with these people?
To: kattracks
How can this women be on the commission? The republicans need to shout from the rooftops but of course, that will never happen.
To: kattracks
Why are members of the Clinton admin on the panel in the first place? His Whitewater lawyer, Ben-Veniste, is also on the panel.
20 posted on
04/12/2004 9:56:18 AM PDT by
thoughtomator
(Voting Bush for lack of reasonable alternatives)
To: kattracks
My, my. Little Miss Gorelick and her smug self questioning Condi Rice last week had some questionable decisions in her past as well. I'd like to see the memos that she sent to HER superiors informing them of this threat. Since she's so big into declassifying memos from the Bush administration, we should see some from x42's days in office!
22 posted on
04/12/2004 9:58:15 AM PDT by
SuziQ
To: kattracks
The very fact that Gorelick and Ben Veniste are even on the 911 Commission throws the whole concept of it being "bi-partisan" right in the toilet. Both have political axes to grind. In Gorelick's case, she was much too involved to be objective. I wonder how receptive the Democrats would have been to the idea of Republican insistence that someone like Lawrence Eagleberger be put on the commission.
To: kattracks
A 'chickens coming home to roost' BUMP TO THE TOP.
Great post kattracks!
Wonder if there is any possibility that Gorelick could be compelled to testify under oath, in public.(yeah right)
/jasper
24 posted on
04/12/2004 9:59:09 AM PDT by
Jasper
To: kattracks
25 posted on
04/12/2004 9:59:31 AM PDT by
jimbo123
To: kattracks
Maybe it's just me, but it seems like if I had either "gore" or "lick" in my surname, I'd change it pronto.
27 posted on
04/12/2004 9:59:41 AM PDT by
Xenalyte
(I may not agree with your bumper sticker, but I shall defend to the death your right to stick it)
To: kattracks
Pass the popcorn, please.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson