Skip to comments.
Freeh: Gorelick Ignored Terror Warnings
NewsMax.com ^
| 4/12/04
| Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff
Posted on 04/12/2004 9:44:47 AM PDT by kattracks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-153 next last
1
posted on
04/12/2004 9:44:53 AM PDT
by
kattracks
To: kattracks
Wowzers....wonder if Ms. G. is feeling the burn...
To: kattracks
Things that make you go "Hmmm..."
3
posted on
04/12/2004 9:47:42 AM PDT
by
Tuxedo
(Zed's Dead....)
To: kattracks
Another brick in the load ........
4
posted on
04/12/2004 9:48:33 AM PDT
by
abc1
To: kattracks
WOW-BUMP!
5
posted on
04/12/2004 9:49:59 AM PDT
by
lucyblue
To: kattracks; Dog; Cap Huff; Ragtime Cowgirl; NormsRevenge; Grampa Dave; BOBTHENAILER; blam; Howlin
This commission has been infiltrated with those who have a stake... or a behind to protect!
6
posted on
04/12/2004 9:50:49 AM PDT
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(The terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States - and war is what they got!!!!)
To: kattracks
will any of the Republican committee members go here during Freeh's testimony? I won't hold my breath.
7
posted on
04/12/2004 9:51:04 AM PDT
by
oceanview
To: kattracks
If the media will cover this, Gorelick will have a bad week. Unfortunately, the only place you will see this is on FR and Newsmax.
8
posted on
04/12/2004 9:51:53 AM PDT
by
The South Texan
(The Democrat Party and the leftist (ABCCBSNBCCNN NYLATIMES)media are a criminal enterprise!)
To: anniegetyourgun
"Wowzers....wonder if Ms. G. is feeling the burn..."
Highly unlikely. Since this story implicates the Clinton administration rather than the Bush administration, it is not likely to grow "legs." The mainstream media will probably ignore it.
9
posted on
04/12/2004 9:52:53 AM PDT
by
Steve_Seattle
("Above all, shake your bum at Burton.")
To: oceanview
You don't want to make the Dems hate us. They love us now. It's such a precarious position we're in. You understand, right?
10
posted on
04/12/2004 9:53:25 AM PDT
by
GraniteStateConservative
(...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
To: kattracks
Hmmmm, the 9-11 Commission comes under suspicion for endangering the country. Wonder if the commissioners are going to be questioned?
11
posted on
04/12/2004 9:54:26 AM PDT
by
McGavin999
(Evil thrives when good men do nothing.)
To: anniegetyourgun
She should be, and not just for this. Pity no-one gave a damn about the various conflicts-of-interest that so many of the commission members seem to have.
12
posted on
04/12/2004 9:54:31 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
To: oceanview
Nope. Your right. The republicans in congress are as weakkneeded as a Seattle homosexual.
13
posted on
04/12/2004 9:54:42 AM PDT
by
RetiredArmy
(We'll put a boot in your ass, it's the American Way! Toby Keith)
To: kattracks
Gorelick should not be on the commission. She is a partisan political hack! And should be fired from the commission.
For that matter, George Stephanopolous should should not be on ABC acting like a journalist. He is a partisan political hack! And should be fired.
Neither one of these things will happen.
14
posted on
04/12/2004 9:54:48 AM PDT
by
isthisnickcool
(I'm isthisnickcool, and I approved this post!)
To: kattracks
When questioning Ms Rice, Goerlick looked like a vacuous grinning maneqin. Though trying to shift the blame for 9/11 to the Bush administration from her own, you could see that she wasn't even buying her own baloney.
To: kattracks
former FBI Director Louis Freeh revealed on Monday, suggesting that Gorelick did little to remedy the situation
If it weren't for the fact that our National Security, sovereignty and survival are at stake, all these finger pointing would be funny.
I still remember reading the summer of 2000 Congressional Joint Intelligence Committee report. It spoke of various terrorist threats and organizations and persons. Congress knew, even then that al-Qaeda/bin Laden was just one of the potential problems.
All this fingerpointing and blamegame is idiotic. It's all bluster. Not much will come of it. It is all a political game.
16
posted on
04/12/2004 9:55:00 AM PDT
by
TomGuy
(Clintonites have such good hind-sight because they had their heads up their hind-ends 8 years.)
To: anniegetyourgun
Only if she reads Newsmax. While the mainstream media continues to send the sharks after Bush, any stories like this will never see the sun.
We FReepers get all giddy when we see these stories. But they go nowhere.
17
posted on
04/12/2004 9:55:18 AM PDT
by
Solson
(Always remember when you are on top of the world , that the earth rotates every 24 hrs.)
To: kattracks
Its' a no-brainer that she should NOT be on this commission. Who appointed her? And how did her appointment get through? What is wrong with these people?
To: kattracks
How can this women be on the commission? The republicans need to shout from the rooftops but of course, that will never happen.
To: kattracks
Why are members of the Clinton admin on the panel in the first place? His Whitewater lawyer, Ben-Veniste, is also on the panel.
20
posted on
04/12/2004 9:56:18 AM PDT
by
thoughtomator
(Voting Bush for lack of reasonable alternatives)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-153 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson