Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SPAIN'S CROWN PRINCE IN SNIT AT MIA (MIAMI INTERNATIONAL)
Miami Herald ^ | Apr. 10, 2004 | Luisa Yanez,Ina Paiva Cordle

Posted on 04/10/2004 4:39:59 AM PDT by JesseHousman

An international incident is touched off when Miami airport screeners insist on examining the luggage of the successor to the Spanish throne and his entourage.

Crown Prince Felipe of Spain and his fiancée pitched a royal fit at Miami International Airport Thursday night, when screeners insisted on searching the future king's luggage -- just as they would any Average Joe's.

Members of the prince's entourage called the required inspection of their private belongings an ''insult'' and ''humiliating'' -- sparking a diplomatic flap that has the United States and Spain on the brink of a protocol war.

Crowning it off, Iberia Airlines, the prince's carrier of choice, is suggesting it might pull out of the airport, according to two sources close to the international incident.

Now, Miami-Dade Mayor Alex Penelas has sent the Prince of Asturias, next in line for the throne, an apology, saying he's asked for an investigation into what went wrong.

Thursday's diplomatic dust-up occurred when the tall, blue-eyed, 36-year-old Prince Felipe de Borbón and his beautiful bride-to-be, Letizia Ortiz, 31, a well-known TV newscaster, flew into MIA to catch a connecting flight home.

The couple and four bodyguards landed at MIA around 5 p.m. on a private chartered jet from Nassau. They were booked on a 6 p.m. Iberia Airlines flight to Madrid.

Whether the prince gave U.S. diplomatic officials enough notice of his arrival is at the heart of the problem.

The U.S. State Department requires 72 hours notice to arrange for expedited security screening in a private area. The prince's people called with six hours notice.

When members of the royal party were told that they and their carry-ons would have to be searched -- just like the masses -- the royal flap erupted.

''We're your allies!'' one member of the royal delegation shouted in Spanish to inspectors at a particularly tense moment.

But according to Lauren Stover, spokeswoman for the Transportation Security Administration in Miami, the screeners were only doing their jobs. The mandates of the Department of Homeland Security following Sept. 11 require that all commercial airline passengers be screened -- even the princely ones.

''The prince and his bodyguard felt they should not be subjected to the screening, but if they do not have an escort from the State Department or the Secret Service, it is required,'' Stover said. ``It's the law.''

To accommodate blue-blooded sensibilities, the TSA gave the group a choice of a quick public screening or a slower but private one away from commoners. The royal entourage chose a private screening and the group was taken to an American Airlines' lounge.

Stover said three ''top-notch screeners with VIP experience'' and two supervisors rushed to the lounge to conduct the search.

The need by the princess-to-be to go the powder room caused another flare-up. Ortiz was told her already-searched purse would be searched again on her return from the nonsecure area. She decided to hold it.

That sparked more angry words and exchanges, delaying the process and making the entire royal party late for the flight, which waited.

At one point, Milton Oribe, Iberia's station manager, said he would ignore the required screening, come what may, witnesses said.

Oribe also offered to vouch for the prince and his entourage, adding that he would see to it that the Spanish carrier withdrew from MIA, according to witnesses on the scene.

Mayor Penelas, calling the brouhaha a ''lamentable situation,'' immediately sent a letter of apology to the the royal family and pointed out those doing the screening were federal employees.

''The facts I have received thus far indicate an apparent disregard for protocol and disrespect of His Highness and his delegation. . . . I have called upon our County Manager to conduct a complete investigation into this matter,'' Penelas wrote in a letter dated Thursday.

An official of the Spanish Consulate in Miami said Friday that it will be up to Consul General Javier Vallaure to decide whether a complaint will be sent to the U.S. State Department.

''We don't consider this the proper way to treat our future king; it's a breach of protocol,'' said the consular official, who would not give his name.

Said Stover: ``Had anything happened on that flight to the prince or anyone on that aircraft because we decided to relax our screening processes, that would have been catastrophic and a complete failure on our part.''


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Florida; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: airlinesecurity; aliens; apology; crownprince; miami; royals; screening; spain; tsa; turass
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-227 next last
''We don't consider this the proper way to treat our future king;...

Nor do I.

If the doltish screeners would profile properly instead of having every Average Joe remove their shoes and if they'd stop confiscating nail clippers, things would go much smoothly.

The TSA needs to be staffed by persons with some intelligence who are trained to look at passengers rather than personal effects. If this was done half of these screeners could go back on the dole or back to placing pickles on Big Macs.

I'm certain that this incident will be seen by Spaniards as an affront to Prince Felipe, regardless of the fact that their new socialist (communist) government is no longer an ally of the United States.

1 posted on 04/10/2004 4:40:00 AM PDT by JesseHousman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JesseHousman
If what's good enough for Americans isn't good enough for these clods, they should've stayed home.
2 posted on 04/10/2004 4:42:20 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JesseHousman
The world needs to get rid of these gorified wefare queens and kings.
3 posted on 04/10/2004 4:42:32 AM PDT by tkathy (nihilism: absolute destructiveness toward the world at large and oneself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
Exactly. They should stay in Europe if they don't like it.
4 posted on 04/10/2004 4:43:05 AM PDT by areafiftyone (Democrats = the hamster is dead but the wheel is still spinning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JesseHousman
I disagree totally. Consider this scenario; someone kidnaps your two year old says they will kill her if you dont bring something onto an airplane. That scenario renders the "grandmother" everyone on FR is quick to refer to, just as dangerous as mohamed atta. Either everyone is screened equally, or its useless to do it it all.
5 posted on 04/10/2004 4:44:17 AM PDT by cardinal4 (Terrence Maculiffe-Ariolimax columbianus (hint- its a gastropod.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JesseHousman
What did the Prince think he was, Saudi royalty?
Only the Saudi's should get special treatment. ........... [/sarcasm]


6 posted on 04/10/2004 4:44:28 AM PDT by Diogenesis (If you mess with one of us, you mess with all of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
And it was pretty gutless of Penelas to apologize.
7 posted on 04/10/2004 4:45:18 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
If what's good enough for Americans isn't good enough for these clods, they should've stayed home.

That's just my point.

this is not good enough for Americans! Security "procedures" in airports are counterproductive and useless. There needs to be a more sophisticated method of screening than what what has been edicted and then employed by these vapidly stupid TSA employees.

It's an insult to Americans and it is an insult to the royal family of Spain.

8 posted on 04/10/2004 4:47:43 AM PDT by JesseHousman (Execute Mumia Abu-Jamal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
#6 is a good point and the photo illustrates it correctly.
9 posted on 04/10/2004 4:48:57 AM PDT by JesseHousman (Execute Mumia Abu-Jamal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JesseHousman
Mayor Penelas, calling the brouhaha a ''lamentable situation,'' immediately sent a letter of apology to the the royal family and pointed out those doing the screening were federal employees.

Yeah ... if only they had been Miami/Dade County employees it would have gone so much smoother ... after all, they speak Spanish, very little else.

10 posted on 04/10/2004 4:50:27 AM PDT by BluH2o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cardinal4
...or its useless to do it it all.

It's much better to know your terrorists before they get their raggedy arses to the gate.

Passengers should be screened by profile!

11 posted on 04/10/2004 4:51:17 AM PDT by JesseHousman (Execute Mumia Abu-Jamal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JesseHousman
There needs to be a more sophisticated method of screening

Ya... PROFILING.

Muslim? Middle-Eastern? 17-44? Male?
DING! DING! DING!

12 posted on 04/10/2004 4:51:26 AM PDT by Darryl Newhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: JesseHousman
Well, it's what we've got at the moment. And if visitors don't like it, they can bloody well stay home!
13 posted on 04/10/2004 4:52:54 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BluH2o
...they speak Spanish...

They speak Norte Americano Spanish. Spaniards have a difficult time understanding what Mexicans are saying.

14 posted on 04/10/2004 4:53:11 AM PDT by JesseHousman (Execute Mumia Abu-Jamal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Darryl Newhart
Exactly!
15 posted on 04/10/2004 4:53:43 AM PDT by JesseHousman (Execute Mumia Abu-Jamal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JesseHousman
IIRC, recent reports outlined tactics to smuggle terrorists by cover of entourage.

To accommodate blue-blooded sensibilities, the TSA gave the group a choice of a quick public screening or a slower but private one away from commoners.

Commoners! My, my. Since I'm considered the queen in my household, I wonder if that trumps a prince.

16 posted on 04/10/2004 4:56:41 AM PDT by Quilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JesseHousman
DO YOU KNOW WHO I AM??!!
17 posted on 04/10/2004 4:56:48 AM PDT by NewHampshireDuo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JesseHousman
Perhaps the royal train of Spain was traveling with cocaine.

Leni

18 posted on 04/10/2004 4:57:11 AM PDT by MinuteGal (Paradise is not lost ! You'll find it May 22 aboard "FReeps Ahoy 3". Register now for our cruise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JesseHousman
Passengers should be screened by profile!

On this we agree. I cant tell you much, but I can say, ( I just asked) that the airline I work for scans the future reservations systems for any potential trouble. In the Arab world names are very similar, so we get a lot of alerts telling us to verify creds on a particular person becuse his name, DOB, or SSN is similar or the same as someone on a no fly list. In fact there is a whole department dedicated to this. Im trying to find the article now, but another airline did a story about their department and how they walk a fine line between civil rights and terrorism. In my opinion, in a linited way, these two cancel eachother out..

19 posted on 04/10/2004 4:57:55 AM PDT by cardinal4 (Terrence Maculiffe-Ariolimax columbianus (hint- its a gastropod.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal
LOL! Mainly on the plane?
20 posted on 04/10/2004 4:58:50 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-227 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson