Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: deport
It didn't mean that in 2000. Gore didn't spend a dime there, but Bush sure did.
17 posted on 04/06/2004 1:35:40 PM PDT by GraniteStateConservative (...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: GraniteStateConservative
Granted, I don't think President Bush has much chance of winning in CA and I doubt the campaign really thinks so either... But I don't think you'll find that the President will write it off immediately and never consider it like his father did in 1992. President Bush won CA in 1988 by 3% and lost it in 1992 by 14%... quite a turn around for the state and it may be lost for sometime to come.

This campaign will hinge on a few states and I doubt that CA is one of them.... but if Kerry has to guard his 'six' then it's not a back use of funds, imo..... of course yours may vary.


24 posted on 04/06/2004 1:46:10 PM PDT by deport (("These guys are the most crooked, you know, lying group I have ever seen. It's scary," Kerry said.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson