Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congress to TSA: Arm More Pilots or Suffer Consequences
Gun Owners of America ^ | April 6, 2004 | NA

Posted on 04/06/2004 11:31:40 AM PDT by neverdem

www.gunowners.org
Apr 2004

Congress to TSA: Arm More Pilots or Suffer Consequences

Gun Owners of America
8001 Forbes Place, Suite 102
Springfield, VA 22151
(703)321-8585

Tuesday, April 6, 2004

Gun Owners of America alerted you in January to legislation that would soon be introduced by two pro-gun legislators, Senator Jim Bunning (R) of Kentucky and Rep. Joe Wilson (R) of South Carolina.

Last week, both legislators announced the introduction of their bills at a press conference that was attended by GOA and several pilot organizations.

"These pilots are the last line of defense against hijackings," Sen. Bunning said. "They very well may be the only thing that stops the Air Force from having to shoot down a plane full of passengers."

Both S. 2268 and H.R. 4126 are entitled the "Cockpit Security Technical Corrections and Improvements Act of 2004" (or "Cockpit Security Act" for short). This legislation would require that 90% of all pilot/applicants be trained and certified within six months of passage. This short time frame will put pressure on the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) to encourage training by private facilities -- a measure which has been consistently resisted by the TSA.

The TSA has set up numerous roadblocks that have severely restricted the number of pilots who can carry firearms. Initially, the administration certified fewer than 100 pilots. Many applicants were "flunked" because they expressed reservations about TSA policy, and elaborate and redundant physical and psychological exams were used to deter pilots who had already been certified to fly planes containing hundreds of passengers.

Only one training facility was authorized by the TSA at a remote site in New Mexico, making it needlessly inconvenient for most pilots to participate.

According to an explosive news story by CNSNEWS.COM, when pilots began to complain to the Congress and the media about problems with the program, they were threatened with fines and dismissal from the program.

The TSA also implemented an absurd "lock-box" requirement, which forces a pilot to carry his firearm outside his person until the flight deck door is sealed. Pilots who are "deadheading" must place their lock boxes in the cargo area. This has led to firearms being lost, mishandled or stolen.

One pilot with years of federal law enforcement experience told a reporter that, "Pilots go down [to the cargo hold] to get the gun and the baggage handlers have already been in the belly... and the gun is on its way to baggage claim. The [pilots] then have to get back up into the airplane, go down out of the terminal, down to baggage claim and hopefully find their gun on the carousel."

The Bunning-Wilson bills will require that pilots carry their firearms when they deboard their planes -- repealing the awkward "lock-box" procedure and putting thousands of additional certified law enforcement officers on the streets of America’s major cities.

"Tens of thousands of armed pilots are a real deterrent and defense," Sen. Bunning stated. "A few thousand are not."

This would be the third time that Congress has passed bills forcing the TSA to implement an armed pilots program. "[The TSA will] get the message or they'll lose their money for the program," Bunning added. "We'll put it somewhere where it will get the job done."

The current bills also allow for pilots with military or law enforcement experience and proof of firearms proficiency to be deputized immediately.

Opponents of this legislation hate the fact that average citizens (that is, pilots who may or may not have law enforcement training) are being allowed to carry firearms on planes. This is pro-gun legislation that advances freedom in the right direction.

ACTION: Please ask your Representative and Senators to cosponsor this legislation. You can contact your legislators by visiting the Gun Owners Legislative Action Center at http://www.gunowners.org/activism.htm to send them a pre-written e-mail message.

----- Pre-written message -----

Dear

Now that Senator Jim Bunning and Rep. Joe Wilson have introduced the Cockpit Security Act, I encourage you to add your name as a cosponsor to this legislation if you have not already done so.

Among other things, this legislation would require that 90% of all pilot/applicants be trained and certified within six months of passage.

I find it absurd that our planes are still undefended for the most part, even though Al Qaeda has continued to issue threats against our safety.

It is very important that our airplanes be adequately defended, so I urge you to add your name as a cosponsor to this bill. Please let me know what you intend to do. Thank you.

Sincerely,

****************************

"Live Fire" radio with Larry Pratt is now broadcast by the Information Radio Network on Saturdays at 12:00 Noon Eastern. "Live Fire" is simulcast on the web at http://inforadionet.com and previous episodes are archived at http://www.soundwaves2000.com/livefire/ in RealAudio. Recent episodes have included:

* Dr. Frederick Whitehurst: Blowing the Whistle on the FBI Lab's Junk Science
* Nat Hentoff, a liberal columnist discussing Patriot Act threats to the 2nd and 4th Amendments
* Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson, author of Scam: How the Black Leadership Exploits Black America


Up to Home
Copyright, Contact and Credits


TOPICS: Announcements; Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia; US: New Mexico; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: airlinesecurity; armedpilots; bang; banglist; ffdo; goa; guncontrol; gunprohibition; hr4126; s2268; secondamendment; tsa
If you don't want to use the GOA provided links, sent an old fashioned letter, even to the likes of Hillary, Schumer, Feinstein, Durbin, etc. Boxer is co-sponsoring this with Bunning, IIRC.
1 posted on 04/06/2004 11:31:42 AM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All

Calling All Freepers


Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!


2 posted on 04/06/2004 11:32:53 AM PDT by Support Free Republic (Hi Mom! Hi Dad!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *bang_list
BANG

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1110174/posts
3 posted on 04/06/2004 11:34:22 AM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
The TSA will never arm the pilots because Dubya doesn't want the pilots armed.

If he did, they would have been armed long ago.

Contrary to the popular misconception, Dubya is not pro-gun. If he were, the pilots would now be armed and Congress would not have to be strong-arming the TSA and the TSA would not be fooling around with this silly lockbox nonsense.
4 posted on 04/06/2004 12:04:33 PM PDT by Ol' Dan Tucker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Dan Tucker
On the plus side, Bush isn't anti-gun like Kerry and the dems are.

He isn't attending news conferences in the Rose Garden calling for the extention of the Assault Weapons Ban like Kerry would.

He promised to sign the Manufacturer's Liability Protection Bill which is the opposite of Kerry's position.

His Attorney General supports the Individual Right of the Second Amendment.

He has not signed a single anti-gun Bill in the entire time he has been in office.
5 posted on 04/06/2004 1:02:44 PM PDT by Shooter 2.5 (Vote a Straight Republican Ballot. Rid the country of dems.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Shooter 2.5
>>On the plus side, Bush isn't anti-gun like Kerry and the dems are.

No, he is anti-gun in his own special "I-would-sign-an-AWB-extension" sort of way.

>>His Attorney General supports the Individual Right of the Second Amendment.

But with "reasonable infringments" (oops, "restrictions") that are obviously unconstitutional.

Kerry in office would probably be better for gun owners, because Republicans in Congress might find their spines, and because his pandering for a second term would be to avoid offending the swing gun owners whom GWB is taking for granted.
6 posted on 04/06/2004 1:08:06 PM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Your Friendly Freeper Patent Attorney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba
He said he would sign it if it reached his desk before the election. I still voted for him. The NRA and people like me made sure we had a majority in Congress so it won't reach his desk.

Making things worse, believe it or not, makes things worse. Elect Bush, keep the Congress, add more pro-gun Senators and we can pass more Gun Rights.
7 posted on 04/06/2004 1:17:50 PM PDT by Shooter 2.5 (Vote a Straight Republican Ballot. Rid the country of dems.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Dan Tucker
Contrary to the popular misconception, Dubya is not pro-gun.

Contrary to popular misconception, GWB is no conservative other than throwing a rare meatless bone to the "right". At most, he's barely to the right of his father. I thought both GWB and McCain were moderates. I thought McCain was more electable in the general election, so I volunteered for McCain in the primary, mainly because I didn't want any more infringements on the 2nd Amendment. When I woke up, what a dream.

If I could have had my druthers, I would have preferred Alan Keyes. I think Keyes could win a general elction only after events had happened similar to 1980 and the late 1970s, when Reagan beat Carter. If Carter had not been such an abject failure, I don't believe Reagan could ever have won in a general election, IMHO.

8 posted on 04/06/2004 1:28:51 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Shooter 2.5
On the plus side, Bush isn't anti-gun like Kerry and the dems are.

He isn't attending news conferences in the Rose Garden calling for the extention of the Assault Weapons Ban like Kerry would.

He promised to sign the Manufacturer's Liability Protection Bill which is the opposite of Kerry's position.

His Attorney General supports the Individual Right of the Second Amendment.

He has not signed a single anti-gun Bill in the entire time he has been in office.




1) Ah, the lesser of two evils. Now there's a good reason to support him. Kerry wants to drive the car off the cliff at 60mph but Dubya only wants to go over the cliff at 50mph. Brilliant logic.

2) I'm waiting before he actually allows the AWB to sunset before I count this particular chicken. I'm still predicting this will be renewed.

3) Let's see. Dubya is a politician. This year is an election year. Sorry, but the last time I believed a Bush's election year promise was when he promised "No New Taxes..." and we all know how much that promise was worth.

4) His AG says he supports the 2nd. I've yet to see any action that proves it. See #3.

5) Of course, he hasn't vetoed any bills yet, either. And he has promised to sign the AWB bill when it reaches his desk.

On the other hand, Dubya holds Stone's chain and Stone has not allowed pilots to be armed. What does that tell me? That Dubya has not authorized Stone to allow pilots to be armed.

If Dubya wanted pilots armed, you would not see the nonsense noted in the above article and instead you'd see armed pilots.

Are you saying that Stone is acting in anything other than his boss's wishes?
9 posted on 04/06/2004 1:41:34 PM PDT by Ol' Dan Tucker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Contrary to popular misconception, GWB is no conservative other than throwing a rare meatless bone to the "right". At most, he's barely to the right of his father. I thought both GWB and McCain were moderates. I thought McCain was more electable in the general election, so I volunteered for McCain in the primary, mainly because I didn't want any more infringements on the 2nd Amendment. When I woke up, what a dream.




Like is father before him, Dubya never met a big-government snake oil he didn't like. The apple never falls far from the tree...
10 posted on 04/06/2004 1:44:01 PM PDT by Ol' Dan Tucker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba
"Kerry in office would probably be better for gun owners, because Republicans in Congress might find their spines, and because his pandering for a second term would be to avoid offending the swing gun owners whom GWB is taking for granted."

Are you willing to bet your guns on that?
11 posted on 04/07/2004 12:09:25 AM PDT by shekkian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: shekkian
Are you willing to bet your guns on that?


Kerry will never get my vote, but Bush has yet to earn it, and it is looking unlikely that he will.

I bet my guns either way. I choose between bad, and "maybe worse".
12 posted on 04/07/2004 7:44:47 AM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Your Friendly Freeper Patent Attorney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson