Not at all (and she's a lovely child), but your post evoked a point to be made about the important distinctions between the Constitutional protection for the free exercise of religion and religiously sponsored sedition.
Fair enough. However, do you really think banning the wearing of a Ha jib in public schools is going to stop such religiously sponsored sedition?
I can think of several more effective ways:
1. Elimination of visa's (not the credit card) for people from countries deemed to be sponsors of terrorism.
2. Elimination of tax breaks for any such church that is guilty of seditious practices.
3. Prison, then deportation of non citizens who practice sedition.
4. FBI infiltration/monitoring of such Churches to determine if they are in fact practicing sedition.
But banning Ha jibs?
Your right, she is a lovely child. The reason I picked that picture was because of the look of total innocence that she evoked.