Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: spunkets
"...The swastika is not part of any religion's traditions..." I beg to differ with you. The swatika is a form of cross. It's been around for a lot longer than Hitler ever was. One story has it that when Hitler was looking for a symbol for the Nazi party, he was in a church and was looking at some of the stained glass windows and saw that cross. He obviously liked it, so he adopted that as the symbol he was looking for. Like the Confederate flag, they are both simple and unoffensive in and of themselves. But since they've been co-opted by a couple of very-less-than-wholesome organizations, they are both reviled and hated. Lord only knows what is next in line to be used in such a manner.
131 posted on 03/31/2004 6:49:32 AM PST by NCC-1701 (Support Mel Gibson and "The Passion of the Christ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]


To: NCC-1701
You are right that one version of the swastika has been a religious symbol all over the world for hundreds of years (Christians, Native Americans, Hindus) but I believe that Hitler reversed the swastika. The Nazi swastika is the mirror image of the sacred swastika.
139 posted on 03/31/2004 7:02:02 AM PST by CobaltBlue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]

To: NCC-1701
There were a lot of artistic variations of the cross historically. The swastica rotates in the opposite direction of the rare artistic variation of the Christian cross it resembles, if I remember right.
141 posted on 03/31/2004 7:04:49 AM PST by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson