Posted on 03/30/2004 7:09:24 PM PST by neverdem
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"/>
March 31, 2004
Iraq Arms Inspector Says Search Is a TangleBy DOUGLAS JEHL
In the public version of testimony delivered behind closed doors to two Senate committees on Tuesday, the inspector, Charles A. Duelfer, acknowledged that American inspectors had still not found any evidence of an illicit arsenal. But he seemed less inclined than his predecessor, David Kay, to close the door on the possibility that such weapons might yet be found, saying that inspectors were continuing to pursue leads "some quite intriguing and credible" about concealed caches. A top Democratic senator, Carl Levin of Michigan, later complained that the public version of Mr. Duelfer's testimony had omitted information contained in the classified version that would have raised further doubts about whether Iraq possessed illicit weapons at all. Through a spokesman, Mr. Duelfer responded by saying that the two versions of his testimony "mirror each other, consistent with the protection of sources, methods and other classified intelligence information." Senator Levin, who serves on both panels that Mr. Duelfer addressed in closed session, asked the Central Intelligence Agency to declassify the entire report, to the fullest extent possible, "so the public can reach their own conclusions." Mr. Duelfer, who took charge of the search in January, said at a news conference on Capitol Hill that the picture of Iraq's suspicious activities "is much more complicated than I anticipated going in." He said he could not predict how much more time he might need before he reached final conclusions about what illicit weapons, if any, Iraq possessed at the time of the American invasion last March. "The people we need to speak to have spent their entire professional lives being trained not to speak" about illicit weapons, Mr. Duelfer said in a public version of his testimony. He said that Iraqi scientists and engineers were keeping silent both out of fear of prosecution or arrest by American officials, and out of fear of retribution from supporters of the former government of Saddam Hussein. Mr. Duelfer took over from Mr. Kay, who at the time of his resignation in January said that American officials were "almost all wrong, probably" in assessing before the war that Mr. Hussein's government possessed illicit weapons. Mr. Duelfer said Monday that inspectors had uncovered new information that Iraq had in place before the war at least the technical ability to use civilian facilities to quickly produce the biological and chemical agents needed for weapons. Still, Mr. Duelfer said: "We do not know whether Saddam was concealing W.M.D. in the final years or planning to resume production once more sanctions were lifted. We do not know what he ordered his senior ministers to undertake. We do not know how the disparate activities we have identified link together." The status report issued by Mr. Duelfer was the first such update since October, and it came nearly 10 months after Mr. Kay and his Iraq Survey Group began their hunt last June. The failure of American inspectors to find illicit weapons in Iraq has prompted Democrats, including Senator John Kerry of Massachusetts, the party's presumptive presidential candidate, to press the Bush administration to acknowledge having been wrong in the prewar assessments in which senior officials described Iraq's weapons program as a principal reason for going to war. In urging patience, however, Mr. Duelfer was echoing the calls made by President Bush and by George J. Tenet, the director of central intelligence, to whom he reports as a special adviser. Two Republican senators, Pat Roberts of Kansas, who heads the Senate Intelligence Committee, and John W. Warner of Virginia, who heads the Senate Armed Services Committee, both joined Monday in asking for more time before any final judgments are reached. Mr. Duelfer expressed a particular frustration about what he described as "the extreme reluctance of Iraqi managers, scientists and engineers to speak freely." Even a year after the American invasion, he said, "obtaining clear, truthful information from the senior Iraqi leadership has been problematic even at this point in time." While officials of the Iraq Survey Group had met with "hundreds of scientists," he said, it had yet to identify who in any particular program had played the most critical roles. "Many people have yet to be found or questioned, and many of those we have found are not giving us complete answers," he said. And while American investigators had recovered millions of documents, he said, millions more were destroyed, while a shortage of people who can translate Arabic meant that only a "tiny fraction" of the whole had yet been fully translated. Among former Iraqi officials willing to talk, he said, "they oftentimes are the ones we know were not in the inner circle."
|
Duelfer went in as a WMD skeptic. He's apparently not skeptical anymore.
But let's not forget why we're really in Iraq: The middle-east is a swamp of dysfunctional regimes that produces suicide bombers intent on killing us. The US is over there because somebody needs to start draining that swamp. I'm thankful that we have a president who has the vision and the guts to take the job on.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1036015/posts
http://cryptome.org/iraq-mig.htm
You are certainly correct, unfortunately. Our effort to bring democracy to Iraq as a start to stabilizing the Middle East is a huge undertaking, and may easily fail. But we need to do something. Hats off to Bush for this bold attempt, and let's hope it's a success.
APRIL 2003 late : (LONDON TELEGRAPH UNEARTHS DOCUMENTS LINKING AL QAEDA & IRAQI INTELLIGENCE) The unearthing of documents directly linking Osama bin Laden's al Qaeda organization to Saddam Hussein this weekend may have hermetically sealed the Bush administration's case that dismantling Iraq's Baathist enterprise was in part necessary to undo terrorism's dynamic duo. But closing that case may reopen a Pandora's box for ex-Clinton administration officials who still believe their policy prescriptions protected U.S. national interests against the growing threat of terrorism during the past decade.
The London Telegraph's weekend revelations raise deeply disturbing questions about the extent and magnitude to which President Clinton, his national-security adviser Samuel R. "Sandy" Berger, and senior terrorism and State Department officials including Assistant Secretary of State for East Africa, Susan Rice politicized intelligence data, relied on and even circulated fabricated evidence in making critical national-security decisions, and presided over a string of intelligence failures during the months leading up to the 1998 U.S. embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania.
Analysis of documents found in the rubble of Iraq's intelligence headquarters show that contrary to conventional wisdom, Iraqi military and intelligence officials sought out al Qaeda leaders, not the other way around, and ultimately met with bin Laden on at least two occasions. They also show that channels of communication between al Qaeda and Iraq were created much earlier and were wider ranging in scope than previously thought. The timing of the meetings sheds important new light on how grave the Clinton administration's intelligence failures may have been. On February 19, 1998, about six months prior to the attacks in Dar Es Salaam and Nairobi, Iraqi intelligence officials set in motion a plan to bring a senior and trusted bin Laden aide to Baghdad from Khartoum. One of the key Mukhabarat intelligence documents shows that a recommendation was made for "
the deputy director general to bring the [bin Laden] envoy to Iraq because we may find in this envoy a way to maintain contacts with bin Laden." The meetings took place in March 1998. "The Clinton Intel Record Deeper failures revealed. ," by Mansoor Ijaz, National Review Online, 4-29-2003
Definitely, the question is how to get native Arabs to get under cover for us and not be double agents. That took a long time with the commies.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.