Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saudis Signal They Will Proceed With Oil-Production Cut
New York Times | 3/30/04 | Simon Romero

Posted on 03/30/2004 12:44:44 PM PST by Dane

Saudis Signal They Will Proceed With Oil-Production Cut
By SIMON ROMERO

Published: March 30, 2004

ARTICLE TOOLS

TIMES NEWS TRACKER

Oil (Petroleum) and Gasoline

Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries

Vienna (Austria)

VIENNA, March 30 — Saudi Arabia signaled today that it was proceeding with its plans to cut oil production, prompting a gathering of OPEC officials here this week to voice support for higher crude oil prices, which have become a sensitive political issue in the United States.

"Throwing more oil on the market would be destructive for everybody," said Ali al-Naimi, the oil minister for Saudi Arabia, the most pivotal member of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries. Mr. Naimi sought to brush aside criticism that his nation was seeking higher returns from oil exports, claiming a flurry of speculative activity in commodity markets was behind the recent increase in oil prices.

Still, as if on cue from Mr. Naimi's statements, prices for light crude climbed 35 cents to $35.80 in trading today in New York, approaching the 13-year high they reached earlier this month. OPEC is expected to discuss on Wednesday whether it will adhere to a cut of 1 million barrels announced at a meeting last month in Algiers.

OPEC, which produces roughly a third of the world's oil, is believed to be producing about 26 million barrels a day, or well above its official target of 24.5 million barrels. Supported by strong demand in China and the United States, the price for West Texas crude oil averaged $35.25 a barrel in the first quarter, the highest such level in the last 20 years, according to Cambridge Energy Research Associates.

There appears to be strong sentiment within OPEC to keep prices high, with several delegates speaking in support of Saudi Arabia today, including representatives from Algeria, Libya and Venezuela. "I feel we should go with the cut," Fathi bin Shatwan, Libya's oil minister, told reporters. "Maybe there's a bit of oversupply even."

Despite signs that some producers in the Persian Gulf might be hesitant to pursue an output cut, including the United Arab Emirates and Kuwait, OPEC is expected to sway in the direction of Saudi Arabia, which alone has the swing capacity to rapidly increase or decrease production.

The Saudi economy is growing at its fastest pace since the early 1980's, helped by robust oil sales.

Growing concern in Washington over rising oil and gasoline prices seems to be having little effect on OPEC's decisions.

"People in power know that crude supplies have nothing to do with the current gasoline prices in the U.S.," Mr. Naimi, the Saudi oil minister, told reporters during a brisk walk through the streets of Vienna today. "A lot of things will be said in an election year."

There is little doubt that gasoline prices in the United States, which are expected to reach a record this spring, are bringing renewed attention to OPEC's 11 members. At the Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on March 23, which was mostly about nuclear weapons, Edward M. Kennedy, Democrat of Massachusetts, questioned Spencer Abraham, the Energy Secretary, about energy prices.

"No one in that state can understand why the president of the United States isn't jawboning OPEC to increase production to make a difference at the very time that we're losing men and women over there in Iraq," Mr. Kennedy said. "Maybe there's a rationale for that, but it's an intolerable position."

"We also are concerned about prices," Mr. Abraham replied. "I have expressed this on a number of occasions recently. We've also made it clear that we're not going to beg for oil." But Andrew Card, the president's chief of staff, appearing on MSNBC two days later, said that the United States was consulting with its "allies" in Opec and asking for more production.

Few analysts believe, however, that OPEC will actually implement production cuts even if it announces such measures. For instance, it would be almost impossible for OPEC to immediately implement any cuts in April since its members have already committed to shipping oil to customers around the world next month.

Data collected by analysts that track tanker movement also suggest OPEC shows few signs of letting up shipments. Vela, the tanker arm of Saudi Arabia's national oil company, is thought to be sending more shipments to American ports in the Gulf of Mexico in April than at any month since last October, said Katherine Spector, an energy strategist at Deutsche Bank.

"We might get cuts from a smaller OPEC member like the U.A.E, but more for reasons of maintenance than anything else," said Ms. Spector. "It's hard to see any significant cuts taking place."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: oil; opec
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
Looks like the New York Times is on the side of the Saudis. One can understand that since it seems that the Saudis probably want a Kerry Presidency.

There were reports earlier today on FR, that the Kuwaitis and the United Arab Emirates were bucking the Saudis.

Also an interesting article posted three weeks ago on FR.

The Saudi War on Geroge Bush

1 posted on 03/30/2004 12:44:45 PM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dane
Good post...now for the simple solution...make the following announcement...

The United States is making a policy shift, that it will no longer import oil from OPEC Countries, unless they are a legitimate democracy...therefore, we will only import from Iraq...effective immediately. Have a nice day...see ya!

2 posted on 03/30/2004 12:49:28 PM PST by Heff (NJ Needs Auto Insurance reform!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Does anyone else wonder what the world would be like if the majority of proven oil reserves were not in Suadi Arabia or Kuwait, but in Virginia, say, or Connecticut?
3 posted on 03/30/2004 12:50:13 PM PST by Gefreiter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gefreiter
I'd be rolling a V-8 Subaru instead of a 4 banger if that was the case
4 posted on 03/30/2004 12:51:16 PM PST by AppyPappy (If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dane
North Slope oil is cheaper, but it is also not so sweet.
5 posted on 03/30/2004 12:52:23 PM PST by RightWhale (Theorems link concepts; proofs establish links)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Are we still allied with SA? I know that the administration has claimed they are our allies in the War on Terror, but I haven't heard that claim in a while.
6 posted on 03/30/2004 12:55:40 PM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dane
This is fine by me. The less money we give to the Saudis, the less they have to fork over to their home-grown terrorists and the Palestinians.

Bush should turn this whole thing around to promote drilling in the ANWR. It's time we got away from our dependence on foreign oil produced by terrorist-financing nations.
7 posted on 03/30/2004 12:56:13 PM PST by Prime Choice (Hm? No, my powers can only be used for Good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Sorry about that, the link is below.

Saudis Signal They Will Proceed With Oil-Production Cut

8 posted on 03/30/2004 12:58:02 PM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dane
The Saudi economy is growing at its fastest pace since the early 1980's, helped by robust oil sales.

The Saudi's need the money to keep the rabble quite.....If other countries under cut them and produce more oil instead of less than the Saudi's will have to start dribbling out the oil again to regain there lost share.

Then again with friends like the Saudi's....who needs enemies?

9 posted on 03/30/2004 12:59:21 PM PST by thingumbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Maybe these bastards think they can wreck the USA economy by inflating the cost of oil to where it will cause a meltdown.

God, I hope not. But we as a nation should prepare for the worst.

If this be war, so be it. Kill 'em all and take the oil.

10 posted on 03/30/2004 1:01:37 PM PST by Victor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thingumbob
Sorry.

Insert "their" for "there".

11 posted on 03/30/2004 1:01:52 PM PST by thingumbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Victor
With 6000 plus in the royal family looking for its fair handout of the oil cash and the fact that the per person income of the average Suadi has gone from $28,000 to $8,000 they won't be able to overcome their greed forever without inciting the rathe of the royals or the peasant class.
12 posted on 03/30/2004 1:06:29 PM PST by thingumbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Dane
I may be wrong but me thinks Europe gets a larger percentage of its oil from s.a. then does the U.S. os A.
Can't believe that france is getting too much of the output from Iraq at this point.
Huh, accidentily capitalized the f word in the the last paragraph. Felt it necessary to go back and correct myself.
13 posted on 03/30/2004 1:08:37 PM PST by Joe Boucher (G.W. Bush in 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thingumbob
Then again with friends like the Saudi's....who needs enemies?

You would think we'd be in a good position to set up a favorable long-term deal with the Iraqis and the Russians. They need the cash and we need the crude. Crushing OPEC by any means necessary should really be at the top of this country's to-do list.

14 posted on 03/30/2004 1:10:11 PM PST by AngryJawa (Whatever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Dane
There is plenty of good oil just off the west coast of Florida, almost in sight of Tampa and down the coast. When are we going to stop srewing around with these Arab savages and take care of ourselves? There is more oil off Tampa than off all of Louisianna!! Let's get it!!!
15 posted on 03/30/2004 1:13:29 PM PST by Tacis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dane
The Saudis are playing a dangerous game. They want Bush out so they're offering the Kerry camp the "gas prices" card in the hope that the American electorate cares more about pocketbook issues than the WOT. If Bush counters skillfully it can blow up in Kerry's and the princes' faces.
16 posted on 03/30/2004 1:20:22 PM PST by beckett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dane
There's an awful lot of whining about gasoline prices and worry about it's doing to the economy.

Here's the price of gasoline in 2004 dollars.


17 posted on 03/30/2004 1:21:05 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tacis
There is more oil off Tampa than off all of Louisianna!! Let's get it!!!

IIRC, Jeb Bush himself led the fight to put that oilfield off limits with hysterical fears of Veldezlike oil spills fouling tourist areas. Jeb's great, but he's wrong on this one - bigtime.

Hell, if it would help, Halliburton could drill my backyard for oil if it would move this country away from the ME.

18 posted on 03/30/2004 1:27:24 PM PST by AngryJawa (Whatever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Dane; nuconvert
If the followers of ObL takes over the show in Saudi it is estimated that they will reduce the production 30-40 %.
19 posted on 03/30/2004 1:34:54 PM PST by AdmSmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prime Choice
Let's open up ANWR and pass legislation makin it illegal to import oil from OPEC member. The ban should also include any oil-based products, including plastics.
20 posted on 03/30/2004 1:38:52 PM PST by semaj ("....by their fruit you will know them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson