Skip to comments.
CNN: White House April 2000 Terrorism report DOES NOT EVEN MENTION Al Quaeda.
CNN ^
| April 30, 2001
| CNN State Department producer Elise Labott and Correspondent Andrea Koppel
Posted on 03/28/2004 6:53:59 PM PST by Homer1
Edited on 04/29/2004 2:04:07 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- For the second year in a row, the State Department warned that South Asia "remained a focal point for terrorism directed against the United States" and said trends in terrorism continue to shift from the Middle East to South Asia.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: alqaeda; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
Interesting, this also mentions the White House policy fo going after the whole network, instaed of just OBL. This correlates nicely with what the administration has been saying about not wanting to "swat flies," and instaed to go after terrorism. This within THREE MONTHS of assuming office. This makes Clarke look like an even bigger bonehead.
1
posted on
03/28/2004 6:54:00 PM PST
by
Homer1
To: Homer1; Torie
Nice one!
2
posted on
03/28/2004 6:55:59 PM PST
by
jwalsh07
(We're bringing it on John but you can't handle the truth!)
To: Homer1
Recall that GWB also had the Chinese downing a plane that he had to deal with for a period of time. During that 3 months
3
posted on
03/28/2004 6:57:50 PM PST
by
CMailBag
To: Homer1
April 2000 was the Clinton administration. Not Bush.
4
posted on
03/28/2004 6:58:10 PM PST
by
tbeatty
(Aprile)
To: Homer1
Wow!!!
'State' is the U.S.A.'s first line of defense!
Uh,......what is the 'INS'......hello, 'State'...??
/sarcasm
5
posted on
03/28/2004 6:59:09 PM PST
by
maestro
To: tbeatty; Homer1; cyncooper
This is a comparison of Clinton's 2000 report and Bush's 2001 report.
Excellent find, Homer.
6
posted on
03/28/2004 7:00:07 PM PST
by
EllaMinnow
("Pessimism never won any battle." - Dwight D. Eisenhower)
To: Alamo-Girl; PhilDragoo
FYI....ping!
7
posted on
03/28/2004 7:00:34 PM PST
by
maestro
To: All
But, but, that good, honest, honorable, man Clarke said that Clinton was the greatest terrorist fighter ever and only Republican Presidents were lax on terror. /sarcasm
To: Homer1
CNN might want to disappear that article. It's embarrassing to Clarke and to Clintonistas in general. I'm sure they haven't realized the implications.
9
posted on
03/28/2004 7:03:03 PM PST
by
VadeRetro
To: maestro
Excellent Read There!!
That's why I keep coming back to this site!!!
You people are the best!!!!!!!
Keep up the good work...the Propogandistic Press has to be toppled!!!
G.
10
posted on
03/28/2004 7:05:25 PM PST
by
FlashBack
(USA...USA...USA...USA...USA...USA...USA...USA...USA...USA..USA...USA!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
To: redlipstick; Homer1
Doh. Got it now. Thanks!
11
posted on
03/28/2004 7:05:48 PM PST
by
tbeatty
(Aprile)
To: Homer1; Peach; prairiebreeze; Iowa Granny; Dog; Howlin; JohnHuang2; lysie; Miss Marple; Mo1
bttt
12
posted on
03/28/2004 7:06:46 PM PST
by
kayak
(The terrorists ... are offended by our existence as free nations. ~ GWB 3/19/04)
To: Homer1
Good, we need more of this. Where in the Hell is the counter attack? We should attack Clarke's arguments, not how much money he's making. Clarke's arguments are utterly full of it. The Clintonistas were totally unserious about fighting terror and any honest person knows it.
Next Clarke wil start arguing that Bill Clinton had a "No 'is' with Interns" sign on the White House.
To: Homer1
Good find
14
posted on
03/28/2004 7:09:29 PM PST
by
freeangel
(freeangel)
To: Homer1
You need to email this to the media before CNN remembers it.
15
posted on
03/28/2004 7:12:09 PM PST
by
EllaMinnow
("Pessimism never won any battle." - Dwight D. Eisenhower)
To: Homer1
bttt
To: Homer1
To be honest, I'd never heard of it until after 9/11. But I was in no position to be fighting the islamofascist evil doers.
17
posted on
03/28/2004 7:28:08 PM PST
by
luvbach1
(In the know on the border)
To: CMailBag
Not only the Chinese incident (holding our guys captive!), but he also had to handle the collision of the Japanese Fishing Boat (killing most or was it all on board) by one of our submarines at Pearl Harbor!
We also should not forget that it was a shortened Transition.
To: One Sided Media
We also should not forget that it was a shortened TransitionYep. The Clinton GAO made sure of that.
19
posted on
03/28/2004 7:33:41 PM PST
by
Alia
(California -- It's Groovy! Baby!)
To: Homer1
BTTT
20
posted on
03/28/2004 7:35:18 PM PST
by
visualops
(Two Wrongs don't make a right- they make the Democratic Ticket for 2004!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson