To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
How about they also prosecute Kerry for his perjury before a Senate committee in 1971? Or has the statute of limitations run out on that pack of squalid lies?
2 posted on
03/26/2004 5:01:06 PM PST by
Argus
(If you favor surrender to terrorism, vote Democrat.)
To: Argus
"Or has the statute of limitations run out on that pack of squalid lies?"
yes
And you notice that Kerry has recently backed off his claims of "mass atrocities" that were committed by American GI's in Viet Nam.
I personally called Kerry a "bald face liar" on Laura Ingraham radio show about 3 weeks ago and that same week Kerry "backed off" those slanderous remarks.
14 posted on
03/26/2004 5:07:11 PM PST by
kellynla
(U.S.M.C. 1/5 1st Mar Div. Nam 69&70 Semper Fi http://www.vietnamveteransagainstjohnkerry.com)
To: Argus
Clarke is a two-faced, lying butt kisser. Since Clarke was so incompetent, so is Kerry. But his challenge today also proves Kerry is stupid and suffers dementia. In other words, the penultimate Democrat.
19 posted on
03/26/2004 5:08:51 PM PST by
Lady Jag
(It's in the bag)
To: Argus
How 'bout is they prosecute Kerry for leaking lies from the Contra Hearings, which he headed?
93 posted on
03/26/2004 5:28:27 PM PST by
Eva
To: Argus
The statute of limitations might have gone stale
on for 1971. However, his being at the meeting to
assassinate U.S. Senators, and remaining silent all
these years, is ripe!
94 posted on
03/26/2004 5:28:37 PM PST by
Smartass
To: Argus
I LOVE your comment!
104 posted on
03/26/2004 5:33:16 PM PST by
buffyt
(It's not a CHOICE... It's a CHILD.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson