Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: r9etb
And this is why Condi Rice should set precedent aside and testify in public before the commission. I know that partisan sack of s**t Richard ben Veniste (who NEVER, ever should have been named to the commission) will try to nail her, but I am sure she's equal to the task.
5 posted on 03/26/2004 7:18:54 AM PST by Steve_Seattle ("Above all, shake your bum at Burton.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Steve_Seattle
Not only has this testimony been given in public by Bush officials already, Rice has also made numerous public statements about the threat warnings.

All ignored by the media in favor of Clarke's lies.

If they waive precedent and their reasons for not having her publicly testify and have her appear under oath, fine, but don't believe it will make one whit of difference in how the story is presented.
10 posted on 03/26/2004 7:28:14 AM PST by cyncooper ("The 'War on Terror ' is not a figure of speech")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson