Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Concerns aired about Nevada tests of 'bunker buster' bomb
The Las Vegas Sun ^ | March 24, 2004 at 10:15:53 PST | ASSOCIATED PRESS

Posted on 03/24/2004 5:03:29 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach

LAS VEGAS (AP) - Senators from both parties have expressed concerns that continued research on a new "bunker buster" bomb could lead to a resumption of nuclear detonations at the Nevada Test Site.

During a Senate energy and water subcommittee budget hearing Tuesday, Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., said she feared the Energy Department was "opening the nuclear door."

She cited a report by the Congressional Research Service earlier this month that said the department plans to ask Congress to approve $485 million for the "bunker buster" bomb over the next five years.

Lawmakers expressed concern the Energy Department was asking for $27.6 million in next year's budget to continue research on the weapon. Congress approved only $7.5 million for this year.

Linton Brooks, chief of the National Nuclear Security Administration, acknowledged the funding request for the bomb is "perhaps the single most contentious issue in our budget." The administration oversees the vast Nevada Test Site.

"What we are asking the Congress to do this year is to approve the continuation of the study," Brooks told the subcommittee hearing, which was held in Washington, D.C.

Sen. Robert Bennett, R-Utah, said he feared accidents or sloppiness in testing 65 miles northwest of Las Vegas could have a wide-ranging effect.

"The people in southern Utah, in particular, are very suspicious of anything the government says about nuclear testing above ground or below ground," Bennett said.

Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev., the subcommittee's ranking Democrat, said prior to the hearing that he has always opposed the "bunker buster" bomb.

"I don't think we need new offensive weapons," Reid said.

The Bush administration is studying designs for the new weapon, also called the Robust Nuclear Earth Penetrator. Plans envision a nuclear bomb with a hardened shell that could burrow underground before exploding.

Military strategists say it could be helpful in destroying hidden arsenals and command centers.

Others say it would defeat the purpose of arms control.

There has not been an underground nuclear blast at the test site since Sept. 23, 1992. The last time atmospheric nuclear detonation at the test site was in 1962.

Senior Energy Department officials noted the "bunker buster" bomb is years away from becoming a reality and will not be developed without congressional approval.

"The law is extremely clear that beginning development and engineering requires congressional approval, and there is no one in the administration who has any doubt of or objection to that feature of that law," Brooks said.

Information from: Las Vegas Review-Journal

--


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; US: Nevada; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bunkerbuster; bunkerbusterbombs; doe; nucleartesting; nukes

1 posted on 03/24/2004 5:03:29 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Why are we testing nuclear weapons in Nevada when North Korea is just a hop skip and jump accross the Pacific? >:)
2 posted on 03/24/2004 5:06:26 PM PST by explodingspleen (When life gets complex, multiply by the complex conjugate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Sen. Robert Bennett, R-Utah, said he feared accidents or sloppiness in testing 65 miles northwest of Las Vegas could have a wide-ranging effect.

"The people in southern Utah, in particular, are very suspicious of anything the government says about nuclear testing above ground or below ground," Bennett said.

Bennett is an idiot. Atmospheric testing is prohibited under the Limited Test Ban Treaty which is still in effect.

3 posted on 03/24/2004 5:08:51 PM PST by COEXERJ145
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Others say it would defeat the purpose of arms control.

Who do they think they are trying to control? We are fighting this war on two fronts: Foreign and domestic.

4 posted on 03/24/2004 5:10:59 PM PST by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhombus
"We are fighting this war on two fronts: Foreign and domestic."

And against the same enemy.

5 posted on 03/24/2004 5:15:32 PM PST by billorites (freepo ergo sum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rhombus
You can't move a muscle to try and defend this country without the liberals complaining. It's a combination of something wrong in their basic thinking, and just political pandering to interest groups. But one thing is clear, they long ago stopped caring about the best interests of this country. They will be perfectly happy to sit atop the corrupt, second rate mess they create. And most of us sit around while they create it.
6 posted on 03/24/2004 5:19:15 PM PST by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
""I don't think we need new offensive weapons," Reid said. "

I bet he said it with a straight face, too...in the middle of a world war!!!

Where the Hell do people like this COME from? How can they possibly be elected to ANYTHING?!?!

7 posted on 03/24/2004 5:31:46 PM PST by Long Cut ("Man, don't hit me with those negative waves SOOoo early in the morning." - Oddball)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Long Cut
You ask: "Where do these people come from?"

THEY COME FROM THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY!
8 posted on 03/24/2004 5:41:24 PM PST by TaMoDee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Long Cut
Good question.
9 posted on 03/24/2004 6:10:39 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (The terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States - and war is what they got!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: explodingspleen
Why are we testing nuclear weapons in Nevada when North Korea is just a hop skip and jump accross the Pacific?

Patience, please.

We tested the first A-bomb at Alamagordo, New Mexico.

Once that was proven the SECOND one was dropped for effect.

Test first, fire for effect after. This avoids the embarassment of dropping a 'dud' on the enemy.

10 posted on 03/24/2004 6:20:00 PM PST by LibKill (The right to own weapons IS the right to be free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
"I don't think we need new offensive weapons," Reid said.

3000 families in New York may disagree. Any weapon that kills these nuts before they can commit another 9-11 looks good to me. If they're dug in, we need something to go get them.

11 posted on 03/24/2004 6:25:27 PM PST by #3Fan (Kerry to POW-MIA activists: "You'll wish you'd never been born.". Link on my homepage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson