Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Spielberg and Cruise to do WAR OF THE WORLDS
Variety / Cinescape ^ | PATRICK SAURIOL

Posted on 03/24/2004 2:59:32 AM PST by maquiladora

Mars will invade Earth once again, but this time it will be documented by Steven Spielberg. The INDIANA JONES director will helm a new remake of H.G. Wells classic science fiction invasion story THE WAR OF THE WORLDS, with it looking very likely that Tom Cruise will star in the film.

Cruise's production company had first started working on a revised WAR movie two years ago. With Spielberg now onboard as director, the project will become a joint DreamWorks/Paramount co-production. Cruise and longtime business partner Paula Wagner will produce the movie, with Spielberg and DreamWorks execs Walter Parkes and Laurie MacDonald also likely to have a role.

Screenwriter David Koepp (SECRET WINDOW) is rewriting the latest draft turned in by Josh Friedman (SAHARA). According to the first reports from '02, the film is supposedly set in 1890s England just as Wells' novel is.

The two other major productions of WAR OF THE WORLDS were Orson Welles' October 1938 radio broadcast (which was believed to be authentic by some listeners) and George Pal's 1953 movie.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: movies; spielberg
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 03/24/2004 2:59:33 AM PST by maquiladora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: maquiladora
The two other major productions of WAR OF THE WORLDS were Orson Welles' October 1938 radio broadcast (which was believed to be authentic by some listeners) and George Pal's 1953 movie.

This ignores the movie Independence Day which was also just a remake of the story, or, more correctly, a remake of the 1953 film.

Don't believe me? In a remarkable case of homage to the original movie, an atomic bomb was dropped on the aliens by a B-2. In the 1953 version, an atomic bomb was dropped by a Northrop YB-49 Flying wing, the Jack Northrup designed ancestor of the B-2

Of course, being a politically correct modern remake, the extensive praying at the end of the original that took place in churches and cathedrals was replaced by prayers lead by a Jewish guy, and the destruction of the aliens was accomplished not by viruses "that God, in His wisdom, had created" but by a man-made computer virus

2 posted on 03/24/2004 3:13:29 AM PST by jscd3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maquiladora
According to the first reports from '02, the film is supposedly set in 1890s England just as Wells' novel is.

Excellent. Setting it modern day would have just been Independence Day II. Here's to creaky, metal Victorian tripods!

But Tom Cruise as an Englishman??? Ay yay yay. About as convincing as his high society Park Avenue doctor in Eyes Wide Shut.

3 posted on 03/24/2004 3:16:48 AM PST by Jhensy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maquiladora
What a great childhood movie this was! Scary as heck...let's hope this new version won't muck it up with noisy and unnecessary special effects.

Tom Cruise and Jennifer Garner (Alias), could make it a fabulous remake.

4 posted on 03/24/2004 3:20:57 AM PST by YaYa123 (@The Kerrys Care About All The Little People...who cook, clean and schlep for them.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123
What a great childhood movie this was! Scary as heck

When I saw the LA City Hall go down my folks said I went nuts.

5 posted on 03/24/2004 3:28:48 AM PST by Mike Darancette (General - Alien Army of the Right (AAOTR))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123
I think it's a mistake to recreate it in the 1890's...if Jules Verne had written the story in 2004, it would have been set in 2004 or the near future. I'm afraid it will come off like "The League of Extaordinary Gentlemen" did to most people...though I liked what it was trying to acheive!
6 posted on 03/24/2004 3:31:46 AM PST by mdmathis6 (The Democrats must be defeated in 2004...." MDMATHIS6, The Anti-Democrat")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jhensy
I thought the Cruise/Spielberg combination in Minority Report was just fine.

I agree about the worries of him playing an English journalist though, I'd prefer to see a British actor in that role. Perhaps he won't be playing the lead?

This movie has great potential though, it could be magnificant, I'm really looking forward to it now. Of course it can only happen now because George Lucas has slammed the brakes on Indiana Jones IV after he rejected the script.

7 posted on 03/24/2004 3:32:02 AM PST by maquiladora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mdmathis6
Well I'm glad to see it being filmed in the era it was written for. It means theres no need to update or adapt the storyline to fit modern times. With Spielberg at the helm I strongly doubt it will resemble anything that tragedy of a movie you mentioned.

I have a very good feeling about it.

8 posted on 03/24/2004 3:35:13 AM PST by maquiladora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: maquiladora
I'm interested. We still pull out the 1953 version on occasion and watch it. It's still good.
9 posted on 03/24/2004 3:35:21 AM PST by aardvark1 (Nothing is more terrible than ignorance in action.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aardvark1
Have you heard Orson Welles' radio version?

It's available on the special edition of Citizen Kane. Expertly done and some parts are still convincing which is amazing given the time period.

10 posted on 03/24/2004 3:40:47 AM PST by maquiladora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: All
David Koepp, the screenwriter for this has also written the likes of:

* Jurassic Park (1993)
* Carlito's Way (1993)
* Mission: Impossible (1996)
* Spider-Man (2002)

That's not a bad track record.

11 posted on 03/24/2004 3:46:58 AM PST by maquiladora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maquiladora
"War of the Worlds" in 53 was great (I was 12 at the time), "Independence Day" was ok, but being much older, "WOTW" still was the movie for me until......

"MARS ATTACKS"!!!!
12 posted on 03/24/2004 3:50:25 AM PST by Lokibob (All typos and spelling errors are mine and copyrighted!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maquiladora
a remake of war of the world. wow. hollywood sure is original. can't wait to plop $9 to see another remake of a remake of a remake of a.....
13 posted on 03/24/2004 3:58:34 AM PST by Bommer (John Kerry = War Criminal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jscd3
LOL. I caught the end of the movie on AMC about a week ago and I was thinking the same PC ending they'd have to have if the '53 film was ever re-made.
14 posted on 03/24/2004 4:07:01 AM PST by rabidralph (Fear the Turtle next season.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: maquiladora
I don't think they have to change the story line...just keep it contemporary! The walking towers and all that can be kept the same!
15 posted on 03/24/2004 4:07:05 AM PST by mdmathis6 (The Democrats must be defeated in 2004...." MDMATHIS6, The Anti-Democrat")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Bommer
It's only been made as a movie once, and that was over half a century ago. Besides, that was a 1950's version of the story. This is the first time the original story will be adapted for the screen.

And before you slam remakes any further, it's worth mentioning that a little film called Ben Hur which came out in 1959 and is regarded as one of the great films of all time is a remake of a 1925 remake of a 1907 film adapted from a book.

16 posted on 03/24/2004 4:07:54 AM PST by maquiladora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: maquiladora
I want to see a remake of "Deliverence" with Alec Baldwin reprising the Ned Beatty part.
17 posted on 03/24/2004 4:09:50 AM PST by Bluntpoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jscd3
Interesting. I saw the movie again on regular TV last night. People may have their doubts but I though it was/is a great flick.
18 posted on 03/24/2004 4:25:23 AM PST by Caipirabob (Democrats.. Socialists..Commies..Traitors...Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bluntpoint
I want to see a remake of "Deliverence" with Alec Baldwin reprising the Ned Beatty part.

...AAhhh, Yeah!...LOL!... :))

19 posted on 03/24/2004 4:50:51 AM PST by skinkinthegrass (Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: maquiladora
*sigh* Another cherished childhood memory about to be trashed...

I hope that's not so. But I sure don't trust Hollyweird.
20 posted on 03/24/2004 4:52:49 AM PST by GodBlessRonaldReagan (Count Petofi will not be denied!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson