Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Slender and Elegant, It Fuels the Bomb
NY Times ^ | March 23, 2004 | WILLIAM J. BROAD

Posted on 03/22/2004 9:28:33 PM PST by neverdem

There was no breakthrough, no eureka, no flash of insight. It happened slowly, the advances gradual until what Dr. Gernot Zippe and his colleagues had invented was a compact, almost elegant device for collecting uranium's rare U-235 isotope.

The feat might have remained obscure, except that it helped define the nuclear era: by the 1960's, Zippe-type machines had become the easiest way to make fuel for reactors as well as weapons of terrifying power, for lighting cities or destroying them.

The invention was the uranium centrifuge, and around the world, millions of them now spin in high-security plants often ringed by barbed wire.

If a chief inventor has any regrets, he keeps them private. In a recent interview, he was philosophical about his team's brainchild, saying nations had the responsibility to determine whether the work would ultimately be judged good or evil.

"With a kitchen knife you can peel a potato or kill your neighbor," Dr. Zippe (pronounced TSIP-eh) said by phone from Munich, where at 86 he still works occasionally and flies off to international meetings. "It's up to governments to use the centrifuge for the benefit of mankind."

And benefits there are. Nuclear reactors, with Zippe-type centrifuges often making their uranium fuel, now generate about 16 percent of the world's electricity. That figure may rise in the decades ahead as worries grow about global warming and oil shortages.

But news of Dr. Zippe's invention has recently centered on the dangers of its illicit spread. Experts warn that it may put nuclear weapons into the hands of terrorists or states sympathetic to them.

Last month, a Pakistani nuclear expert, Abdul Qadeer Khan, admitted running a vast smuggling ring that had supplied at least three nations with Zippe-type centrifuges. It appears to be history's worst case of nuclear proliferation.

While nations congratulate themselves for exposing the network, private experts say the secretive centrifuge design at the heart of the illegal trade is still on the loose and the dangers of its misuse are far from over.

"It's small and you can procure the needed items in secret without being detected," said David Albright, president of the Institute for Science and International Security, an arms control group in Washington. "You end up with a small plant that's very hard to find."

The world may be in for an unsettling time if the future of the Zippe centrifuge is as surprising as its past. The tale of its development is full of striking twists, and no little sweat.

"It was very hard work," said Houston G. Wood, a centrifuge expert at the University of Virginia. "Problems of great difficulty had to be solved."

Born and raised in Austria, Dr. Zippe studied physics at the University of Vienna in the 30's and served in the German Luftwaffe as a flight instructor and a researcher on radar and airplane propellers. In 1945, the Russians took him as a prisoner to a special camp for the technically adept.

Moscow was desperate to catch up with Washington in nuclear arms. The hardest part was not the design but getting the fuel. Like all nuclear aspirants, Russia hoped to rearrange nature.

The work centered on isotopes, forms of the same element whose nuclei have different numbers of neutrons. The most prevalent isotope of uranium, which accounts for 99.3 percent of natural uranium, is U-238, with 146 neutrons. It is ever so slightly heavier than U-235, which has three fewer neutrons and accounts for just 0.7 percent of uranium in nature.

But U-235 is highly prized because it easily splits in two to produce bursts of atomic energy. When natural uranium is enriched to contain about 5 percent U-235, it can fuel nuclear reactors; to about 90 percent, atom bombs.

The Russians put Dr. Zippe and other German prisoners of war to work making centrifuges to obtain the rare U-235 isotope. The Americans had tried, but had turned to other methods that were quite bulky, arduous and costly.

The Russian team realized that uranium centrifuges would have to be linked up by the hundreds or thousands so that each could make tiny increases in the U-235 output, slowly raising the concentration. And to be economic and productive, the machines would have to spin continuously for years.

Centrifuges are common devices in industry and medicine that spin fast to separate materials of differing masses — for instance, blood cells from serum. Though they sound exotic, they are simple in principle. A washing machine on spin cycle is a centrifuge, its whirl creating artificial gravity that separates water (heavy) from clothes (light).

A good washing machine spins about 15 revolutions per second. The Russians — to have any hope of exploiting the minute differences in the masses of U-235 and U-238 in order to separate the nearly identical substances — needed centrifuges that spun about 100 times as fast, near the speed of sound.

"Everybody was laughing and said, `This will never work,' " Dr. Zippe recalled. "I was a young man. I had no idea how to do it. But I decided to do my best."

Among the 60 or so experts, Dr. Zippe, whose golden touch seemed to make mechanical things come to life, was soon appointed the team's lead experimenter. The general leader was Max Steenbeck, a physicist and former director of the German company Siemens.

The overall plan was clear, if not the means: start with a hollow, cylindrical rotor. Fill it with gaseous uranium. At the rotor's bottom, use pulsating magnetic fields (much like those of an electric motor) to spin it fast enough to throw the heavier U-238 toward the wall, letting the U-235 accumulate near the center. Slightly heating the bottom of the gaseous mix would produce currents that would tend to move the U-238 down and the U-235 up, where scoops could gather the isotopes.

To realize this ambitious plan, the team worked hard to defeat the main adversary of relentless spinning: friction, which can slow, cripple or destroy machines meant to work flawlessly for years. The rotor casing was evacuated to remove all air. A magnetic bearing was developed to hold the rotor's top steady, eliminating the need for physical support.

Perhaps most important, the team let the rotor rest on a needlelike bearing. It was the only point of physical contact for the spinning assembly, a tiny concession to the material world.

It took years of tinkering and experimentation. But the team finally got the complex devices to work.

The Germans "revolutionized the whole uranium fuel industry," said Pavel V. Oleynikov, a Russian historian of the postwar centrifuge effort.

In 1956, Dr. Zippe was set free, and he returned to Vienna. He went to a meeting in Amsterdam in 1957 and was astonished to learn that the West lagged far behind his team.

He decided to share what he knew. The Soviets had let him take no notes or reports. But as he recalled, "I had it in my head."

Dr. Zippe flew to the United States and, under government supervision, set up shop at the University of Virginia. There, he managed to recreate the Russian centrifuge.

Washington asked Dr. Zippe to join its secretive nuclear establishment and change his citizenship. He resisted. It was too reminiscent of his Soviet days. Instead, he wanted to use the invention for peaceful work, for enriching uranium for commercial reactor fuel.

Flying back to Europe in 1960, Dr. Zippe worked in industry, especially in West Germany, joining the European postwar drive for nuclear independence from the United States.

"He was a little like Oppenheimer," said Mr. Albright, of the arms control group, referring to Dr. J. Robert Oppenheimer, the American atom bomb leader who managed to get stubborn experts to work together. "He had a lot of help, but he was the real spark plug."

In the 1960's, Dr. Zippe and his associates managed to make the centrifuges even more efficient. They switched the rotor material from aluminum to the superhard alloy called maraging steel. That let the centrifuges spin faster, speeding the pace of enrichment without danger that the devices would tear themselves apart.

The team also managed to make the rotors longer, which increased the collection of U-235. It took special joints known as bellows, which let the long centrifuge, like a plucked string, flex and bow safely as its speed increased. "Ten times longer, ten times more," Dr. Zippe said.

In the 1970's, Urenco, a new European consortium for making nuclear fuel, adopted Zippe-type designs. But its security for the potentially deadly technology was lax.

Dr. Khan, the Pakistani expert, worked as a consultant at a Urenco plant and stole the designs. He used them in Pakistan to build centrifuges to make nuclear arms fuel and, as recently disclosed, later sold centrifuge plans and machines to Iran, Libya and North Korea.

"This is a very sorry story," Dr. Zippe said.

A short man with a fondness for string ties and airplanes, which he piloted until he was 80, Dr. Zippe now divides his time between Vienna and Munich, where lives with a son. He says he still consults widely on technical issues, including centrifuges. "If they need something," he said of responsible companies, "I help them."

As for the future of the uranium centrifuge, many experts voice cautious optimism. Newer models are much harder to manufacture and less easily copied, especially illicitly. And the United States and its partners are still tracking down elements of the Khan network, insisting that the illegal traders will be put out of business.

For his part, Dr. Zippe foresees benign possibilities even if his handiwork continues to spread clandestinely. During the cold war, he pointed out, nations with nuclear arms restrained themselves because they understood that the awesome destructiveness could become mutual. "The reason America did not drop the bomb in Korea or Vietnam was fear that the Russians would retaliate," he said.

Today, he added, small states want nuclear arms not necessarily for the sake of aggression or terrorism but to deter foes.

"Let's hope," he said, "there's enough clever people not to use the bomb on people again."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Russia; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: centrifuge; energy; enrichment; miltech; nuclear; nuclearpower; proliferation; uraniumcentrifuge
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 03/22/2004 9:28:33 PM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: fourdeuce82d; Travis McGee; El Gato; JudyB1938; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Robert A. Cook, PE; lepton; ...
PING
2 posted on 03/22/2004 9:35:09 PM PST by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; *miltech
Thanks for the article.
3 posted on 03/22/2004 10:05:30 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (The terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States - and war is what they got!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I forgot the graphic.


4 posted on 03/22/2004 10:10:44 PM PST by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Terrific graphic.
5 posted on 03/22/2004 10:23:16 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (The terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States - and war is what they got!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Uranium 233 is also fissile like U-235. However, it is even less abundant.

Also, even U-238 becomes fissile when bombarded with very high energy neutrons verses the slower "thermal" neutrons for U-235 or Pu-239 fission. The energies needed is produced by a fusion device.

One crude weapon design is called a fission-fussion-fission bomb. You need a small (critical mass) central core of a fissionable isotope like U-235 or Pu-239. This provides
the heat and pressure to set up the fusion of Lithium Deutrium mixtures (et.al.) which produce the high energy neutrons required that cause the normally benign U-238 to fission. The outer casing of this bomb is, of course, the U-238 which goes big boom. Therefore, with a small thermonuclear warhead and an abundant cheap supply of U-238. You can get a big boom, and a rather "dirty" one also - lots of lovely fallout.
6 posted on 03/22/2004 10:28:56 PM PST by Sola Veritas (Nuclear weaponry is interesting stuff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sola Veritas
PS - I don't actually have a clue about the engineering (or the practical physics) it would take to make a fission-fusion-fission weapon. I just know from reading unclassified U.S. Government printed material in the 70s that such a weapon was possible, and I inferred it had been made - they were sometimes called, I believe, "boosted" weapons.
7 posted on 03/22/2004 10:35:22 PM PST by Sola Veritas (Nuclear weaponry is interesting stuff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Thanks...couldn't have done it without that hi-teck spinny-thingy !


8 posted on 03/22/2004 10:42:55 PM PST by Delta 21 (MKC USCG - ret)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Delta 21
Let me guess. The big basketball is a Plutonium core surrounded by explosive lens to implode it and reach super critital mass. The "balls" are probably Lithium deuterium, or other suitable fussionable mixes that the initial detenation set off.

How wrong was I?
9 posted on 03/22/2004 10:48:33 PM PST by Sola Veritas (Nuclear weaponry is interesting stuff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Sola Veritas
These gadgets have held me in awe since I was a kid. I would love to have one of my own some day.
10 posted on 03/22/2004 11:08:50 PM PST by Delta 21 (MKC USCG - ret)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Delta 21
Well, as long as it didn't contain fissile material and any high explosives were removed and repaced with simulants. I don't see why you shouldn't be able to. Unless, of course, the device is still classified.

Probably the detailed designs for the first two bombs are still classified.

However, I am with you. They create a sense of awe in me also. It is amazing that so much energy can be generated by such a relatively small weapon. Thank God, literally, that we got them first.
11 posted on 03/22/2004 11:17:28 PM PST by Sola Veritas (Nuclear weaponry is interesting stuff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Sola Veritas
Well, now what good would it do to have a simulated thermonewcular device? I think there is an amendment or something that says I can have one.
12 posted on 03/22/2004 11:29:09 PM PST by Delta 21 (MKC USCG - ret)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Sola Veritas
Uranium 233 is also fissile like U-235. However, it is even less abundant.

Also, even U-238 becomes fissile when bombarded with very high energy neutrons verses the slower "thermal" neutrons for U-235 or Pu-239 fission. The energies needed is produced by a fusion device.

That's one way to do it. Another is the German *Virus House* device method- a U-235/238 *sandwich* device that's a REALLY crude way to get a nuclear explosion. But impressive enough to have been copied by the Russians as one of their earl;y designs, the RDS-6.

This device was to use a total of 10 layers of semi-refined U-235/238, alternating with Neutron absorbing kerosene. On impact, plungers would crush "Präparat", releasing neutrons, as shear pins broke, allowing the Uranium plates to come together via inertia and make a supercritical mass. The device would then detonate, or at least melt down, causing massive contamination. The target was to be midtown Manhattan. Two prototypes MAY have been built in 1945.

13 posted on 03/22/2004 11:30:26 PM PST by archy (Concrete shoes, cyanide, TNT! Done dirt cheap! Neckties, contracts, high voltage...Done dirt cheap!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: archy
Hey thanks. Those are some interesting links I will bookmark for future reading.
14 posted on 03/22/2004 11:35:53 PM PST by Sola Veritas (Nuclear weaponry is interesting stuff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Delta 21
Well, if you were talking about an M-16 or any other single man military style rifle or pistol, I would agree. However, I think maybe that "private" ownership of a thermonuclear device would not fall under the 2nd Ammendment. Dontcha think? :-)

Personally I would rather own my own howitzer!
15 posted on 03/22/2004 11:42:15 PM PST by Sola Veritas (Nuclear weaponry is interesting stuff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Sola Veritas
That would suffice.

The authorities wouldn't have to worry about me for very long. What good is having your very own nuke if you cant make your very own mushroom cloud with it!


16 posted on 03/22/2004 11:57:33 PM PST by Delta 21 (MKC USCG - ret)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; JoeSixPack1; Tijeras_Slim
Slender and elegant, it IS the bomb!

bad marty! baaaaad!

17 posted on 03/23/2004 12:27:47 AM PST by martin_fierro (A v v n c v l v s M a x i m v s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; All
 
Nuclear WMD "WHAT IF's"...
MORE NUCLEAR WEAPONS LINKS:

http://www.clw.org/control/ctbchron.html

http://www.history.navy.mil/faqs/faq4-1.htm

http://www.projectshad.org/news/secrets-at-sea.htm

http://www.hk94.com/weblog/index.php?p=51&c=1

http://www.nv.doe.gov/news&pubs/photos&films/testfilms.htm

http://www.history.navy.mil/faqs/faq76-1.htm

http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~hpcws/gallery.htm

http://www.downwinders.org/

http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,275007585,00.html

http://www.ratical.org/radiation/NGP/ChernDwinder.html

18 posted on 03/23/2004 1:42:00 AM PST by backhoe (--30--)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sola Veritas
Close.

As you say, the primary device is the Pu core (in the middle, about the size of an orange) surrounded by the HE explosive and numerous detonators. I read that they no longer have to use lenses; they just use enough precision detonators to get the necessary spherical implosion wave. (BTW, I think it takes a lot more detonators than are shown in the diagram!)

Note that there is a gap between the core and the HE. This is called a 'levitated core' design, which increases the yield of the Pu fission reaction by shortening the time it takes to be crushed to criticality. Think of it as using a hammer on a nail by backing up and swinging down, rather than merely resting the hammer on the nail and pressing.

The thin gray layer penetrated by the detonators is natural uranium called a 'tamper.' It helps yield by containing the explosion just a tiny bit longer due to its inertial mass, and by the fact it will reflect some neutrons back into the reaction.

The function of the pearl-like spheres atop the primary is unknown to me. Somewhere there have to be capacitors to store electrical charge used to fire the detonators, but I don't think they would be spherical.

The fission reaction is 'initiated' by the release of neutrons at the precise microsecond that the compressed Pu core reaches maximum density. The more neutrons released into the core at this instant, the more bang you get for a given size core. The neutrons used to be released by a small 'pit' within the core, about the size of a walnut, that contained Polonium and Beryllium, separated by thin metal plating. When the compression shock wave reached the center of the core, the initiator would be crushed, mixing the Po and Be and releasing the neutrons. In the first designs, I believe they were able to get about 10 neutrons into the surrounding Pu before 'disassembly' occurred. The chain reaction takes place so fast that 70 or more generations of doubling take place in a handful of microseconds; and 70 generations of doubling would involve most of the Pu atoms of the core.

So things happen so fast at initiation time that you can't get a whole lot of neutrons released before the thing disassembles.

Recently, I was told that the Po+Be initiator core has been supplanted by a Be core that gets irradiated by protons from a tiny particle accelerator. Perhaps this is what the little spheres are for.

Anyway, on to the secondary.

Intense X-rays are emitted from the primary device. These arrive at the secondary (fusion) device before the shock wave or the neutrons do, so they are what has to do the heavy lifting here. They do it in the cream-colored substance arranged as a hollow cylinder in the rear of the bomb. In the old days, this was simply polyethylene; I don't know what they use now. The stuff absorbs the X-rays and flashes into a superhot plasma. This creates a cylindrical implosion shock wave which then converges on the blue material, which is natural Uranium tamper for the actual secondary device, which is the white rod in the very center. This contains Lithium(6) Deuteride. When compressed and superheated, the Lithium(6) decomposes into Tritium (Hydrogen3) which then fuses with the Deuterium (Hydrogen2) to produce the principal (but not only!) fusion reaction.

This, in turn, produces enough neutron flux to make the Uranium tamper fission, which is our tertiary device.

And this all happens in the microseconds before the shock wave from the primary device would otherwise have blown it to bits anyway, but of course in that case with little or no yield from the secondary and tertiary devices.

So that's my understanding of how a F-F-F (Fission-Fusion-Fission) device works.

19 posted on 03/23/2004 2:40:48 AM PST by Erasmus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
...millions of them...

For SOME reason, I DOUBT this number!!

20 posted on 03/23/2004 5:23:43 AM PST by Elsie (When the avalanche starts... it's too late for the pebbles to vote....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson