Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: aomagrat
I think this is a little silly. I don't like the idea of boycotting stuff just because it is made by Democrats or owned by Democrats.

W in '04

5 posted on 03/14/2004 7:43:57 AM PST by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Las Vegas Dave
I received this reply from Las Vegas Dave on the other post:
"Perhaps email saying,

"Did you know that Mr. Kerry plans on tapping into her $700 million Heinz fortune to overthrow President George W. Bush's 2004 reelection?"

Please remember this the next time you are in the grocery store.

Doesn't sound as strong as "BOYCOT HEINZ", but gets the point across"

13 posted on 03/14/2004 7:50:53 AM PST by MaryFromMichigan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: nwrep
It might be helpful first to determine how much, if any, interest Teresa has in the day-to-day function of the company. While she inherited a ton of money from the late H.J. Heinz III, we don't know whether her current holdings include common stock or any other financial interest in the company's success.
15 posted on 03/14/2004 7:52:31 AM PST by mountaineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: nwrep
You think it's a little silly? Teresa Heinz Kerry doesn't.

Teresa Heinz Kerry is warning that she'll use the vast Heinz ketchup fortune to repel personal attacks by the Bush campaign - insisting for the first time publicly that there are legal ways around the campaign finance laws that could allow her to spend far more than the $2,000 legal limit to get her husband elected.

Asked last week if she had decided to spend "any of your own fortune" on the presidential race, Heinz Kerry initially told National Public Radio's Renee Montagne, "I cannot, by law; $2,000 is it, and I've said that so many times."

But in the next breath the ketchup heiress warned, "Any time the honor of my family or myself is trashed, I will do what any American would try and do, which is to fight to redeem it."

"And there are legal ways of doing that," she insisted.

Heinz Kerry predicted that the Bush campaign would indeed go after her and her family personally, setting off the tripwire that would open up her $700 million pocketbook.

"I'm sure it will get very ugly and personal," she warned. "But I think . . . ugliness speaks for itself, and expensive ugliness speaks for itself even more."

Asked if she was expecting "any particular accusations, any particular vulnerabilities on your part?" Heinz Kerry told NPR, "No."

"[There are] no vulnerabilities on my part. My life's an open book. I'm honest, I work hard, I care about people, and I have hopes for the world and for us, and I think we're not being well-served and well-led."


17 posted on 03/14/2004 7:55:57 AM PST by arasina (So there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: nwrep
Silly? Maybe, but did you see this?http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1097409/posts
30 posted on 03/14/2004 8:08:41 AM PST by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: nwrep
The issue isn't that it's made by Democrats, it's that TherAYza Heinz-Kerry has threatened to use the vast Heinz coffers for political ends - slithering Democrat-style through some undisclosed loophole in the CFR.

She's free to do it, and we're free to boycott.

39 posted on 03/14/2004 8:25:22 AM PST by Lexinom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: nwrep
Ever hear of fighting fire with fire. When someone obtains their wealth from you and uses it against you, are you going to continue to supply them the resources to cook your goose? I'm not... silly it may be to you, but for me it's smart politics.
42 posted on 03/14/2004 8:29:10 AM PST by Godfollow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: nwrep
I think this is a little silly. I don't like the idea of boycotting stuff just because it is made by Democrats or owned by Democrats

Boycotting is a patriotic American tradition since before the term "boycott" was coined. In the 18th century, the Sons of Liberty agreed to "non-importation" leagues, solemnly covenanting with each other not to drink British tea, not to purchase British woolens, and to avoid "foreign luxuries." The problem with our modern boycotts is that we don't really put any teeth in them. Back then, if a merchant brought in British goods, a sign in the shape of a hand was placed over the merchant's door, warning everyone not to shop there.

If conservatives stuck together on this, we could shut down corporate cowards and build up corporate heroes.
96 posted on 03/14/2004 10:47:35 AM PST by farmer18th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: nwrep
Theresa Heinz's foundation funds all sorts of liberal organizations. This isn't just about the 2004 campaign.

How do you think the 9/11 families were contacted to speak out?

Defund the left.

160 posted on 03/14/2004 8:54:54 PM PST by weegee ('...Kerry is like that or so a crack sausage.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: nwrep
If you think is is silly dont do it. That is simple.
174 posted on 03/15/2004 5:22:28 AM PST by gunnedah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: nwrep
I think this is a little silly.

No, it's worse, it's BIG silly!

202 posted on 03/15/2004 4:38:14 PM PST by iconoclast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson