Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/07/2004 2:58:45 PM PST by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Theodore R.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;...

But it's OK to fund the Church of Marx principally because it denies the Revealed God of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. The pagans are just silly and quaint so we do not have to work up a sweat over them.

Do not atheists make a statement on religion by denying God. As such, shouldn't their state funded school activities and scholarships be restricted? Didn't the Soviet Communists force -- establish atheism -- on the masses. Isn't atheism one view of many on spectrum of world theology? Isn't this tyrannical view of "separation of state" taken by the left taking the side of atheists? Soon, the Republican party won't be able to legally function because it has too many adherents of the revealed religions in its makeup.

2 posted on 03/07/2004 3:26:50 PM PST by LoneRangerMassachusetts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Theodore R.
But it was a STATE that denied the funds, no? The First Amendment shouldn't even have been dragged into the discussion. The USSC shouldn't even have agreed to hear this case.
4 posted on 03/07/2004 4:09:01 PM PST by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson