Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jim Noble
It would have been very simple to say, "Any person who has served as President for two terms, or for one term plus 731 days, shall be permenently ineligible to the office of President or Vice-President".

Yes, but it isn't necessary to recapitulate the 12th amendment.

I see your argument though, that "election" and "eligibility" can somehow be construed differently. The argument has to boil down to "Clinton is not constitutionally ineligible to the office of President," even in light of the 22nd amendment. I wouldn't want to be the one making the argument.

53 posted on 03/03/2004 6:15:53 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt
The argument has to boil down to "Clinton is not constitutionally ineligible to the office of President," even in light of the 22nd amendment. I wouldn't want to be the one making the argument.

That's because you are not a leftist sociopath.

63 posted on 03/03/2004 8:09:00 AM PST by Jim Noble (Now you go feed those hogs before they worry themselves into anemia!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson