Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dan from Michigan
Hmm ... they would not be stupid enough to try and confiscate that much ammo.
8 posted on 03/02/2004 3:21:32 PM PST by Centurion2000 (Resolve to perform what you must; perform without fail that what you resolve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Centurion2000
The way they'd slip it by is to stop the manufacture of new ammo. That way it wouldn't be an outright confiscation, and people would think "Oh well, I have quite a bit of ammo in supply." A false sense of security. Then, it would slowly dwindle until you had none left, or it was so "stale" that it was worthless. Now you're unarmed.
33 posted on 03/02/2004 4:09:23 PM PST by RightthinkinAmerican (Try and tackle ME, Franken.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Centurion2000
Hmm ... they would not be stupid enough to try and confiscate that much ammo.

Wanna bet, they are pretty stupid. Besides if they just ban sale to the public, eventually the existing stocks will be depleted... although in my case it would take quite awhile at current usage rates. I'd try to use what I had where it would do the most good.

118 posted on 03/05/2004 9:02:29 AM PST by El Gato (Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson