Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lurkina.n.Learnin
HJTA does have one valid point though.
%nbsp %nbsp "the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association considers a "no" vote on Proposition 56 to be the top priority for the coming election. "

ABSOLUTELY - NO ON 56!

If you see the original post, I was referring to HJTA's position on Prop 57/58. Those are the positions that are inaccurate and misleading.

20 posted on 03/01/2004 3:12:29 PM PST by calcowgirl (No on Propositions 55, 56, 57, 58)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: calcowgirl
Yes I agree,I'm just saying that arguments can be made infavor of 57 &58. I disagree with those arguments but 56 is indefensable. 56 is based on fraud and deciet. If 56 passes I will immedeatly start preparing to become a Calistinian refugee.
28 posted on 03/01/2004 4:18:18 PM PST by Lurkina.n.Learnin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson