Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NUMBER ONE: KERRY RANKED 'MOST LIBERAL' IN SENATE ROLL CALL VOTES, TOPS KENNEDY, CLINTON
Drudge ^ | 2/27/04 | Drudge

Posted on 02/27/2004 7:01:30 AM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection

XXXXX DRUDGE REPORT XXXXX FRI FEB 27, 2004 09:39:45 ET XXXXX

NUMBER ONE: KERRY RANKED 'MOST LIBERAL' IN SENATE ROLL CALL VOTES, TOPS KENNEDY, CLINTON

NATIONAL JOURNAL on Friday claimed Democrat frontrunner John Kerry has the "most liberal" voting record in the Senate.

The results of Senate vote ratings show that Kerry was the most liberal senator in 2003, with a composite liberal score of 96.5 -- far ahead of such Democrat stalwarts as Ted Kennedy and Hillary Clinton.

NATIONAL JOURNAL's scores, which have been compiled each year since 1981, are based on lawmakers' votes in three areas: economic policy, social policy, and foreign policy.

"To be sure, Kerry's ranking as the No. 1 Senate liberal in 2003 -- and his earning of similar honors three times during his first term, from 1985 to 1990 -- will probably have opposition researchers licking their chops," NATIONAL JOURNAL reports.

Developing...

[The ratings system was first devised in 1981 under the direction of William Schneider, a political analyst and commentator at CNN, and a contributing editor to National Journal, who continues to guide the calculation process. Data processing and statistical analysis were performed by Information Technology Services of the Brookings Institution. A panel of National Journal editors and reporters initially compiled a list of 140 key congressional roll-call votes for 2003 -- 63 votes for the Senate and 77 for the House -- and classified them as relating to economic, social, or foreign policy. Roll-call data was drawn from the Congressional Record.]


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004; kerry; kerryrecord; massachusettsliberal; most8liberal
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

1 posted on 02/27/2004 7:01:31 AM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Dang, you beat me by 13 seconds.
2 posted on 02/27/2004 7:02:59 AM PST by kennedy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kennedy
It was soooo close.
3 posted on 02/27/2004 7:04:07 AM PST by nuconvert (CAUTION: I'm an acquaintance of someone labelled :"an obstinate supporter of dangerous fantasies")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Shocked....shocked, I say....
4 posted on 02/27/2004 7:07:02 AM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
Stunned....

L

5 posted on 02/27/2004 7:08:18 AM PST by Lurker (Don't bite the hand that meads you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
And the Artic is cold and Hell is hot.

What will the media discover next? Like to see CNN whitewash this report even with their "political expert" as the pointy head that developed the formula.
6 posted on 02/27/2004 7:08:26 AM PST by The South Texan (The Democrat Party and the leftist (ABCCBSNBCCNN NYLATIMES)media are a criminal enterprise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
I hope this President Bush does not repeat his father's reluctance to use the "L" word until the last minute. The time to dump the "new tone" was long ago. Gloves off!
7 posted on 02/27/2004 7:10:34 AM PST by truthkeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kennedy; Tumbleweed_Connection; MeekOneGOP; autoresponder
Kaption Ketchup Kerry - He's NUMBER ONE!

8 posted on 02/27/2004 7:12:27 AM PST by Happy2BMe (U.S.A. - - United We Stand - - Divided We Fall - - Support Our Troops - - Vote BUSH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: truthkeeper
"I hope this President Bush does not repeat his father's reluctance to use the "L" word until the last minute."

Dubya - are you listening?

(Kinder and gentler yes - but just make sure it has some teeth in it.)

9 posted on 02/27/2004 7:13:46 AM PST by Happy2BMe (U.S.A. - - United We Stand - - Divided We Fall - - Support Our Troops - - Vote BUSH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
I would wait till after the convention. Before you risk Kerry backing out and Hitlery coming in as a more moderate candidate.

There is enough to bury Kerry now. I would start twice a month political ads in potential swing states just reminding people of Kerry's liberalism.

Be subtle about it but make people think.


10 posted on 02/27/2004 7:20:48 AM PST by EQAndyBuzz (60 Senate seats changes the world!! Bury Kerry in 04!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz
>> Hitlery coming in at convention . .

Good point.

11 posted on 02/27/2004 7:25:33 AM PST by Happy2BMe (U.S.A. - - United We Stand - - Divided We Fall - - Support Our Troops - - Vote BUSH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
This proves Kerry is a liberal with a capitol L. He may be more liberal than his predecessor from Massachusetts, Dukakis. Surprise... Surprise (/sarcasm off). Saw him last night on the debate. Boooring with a capitol B. Wooden. Got almost no applause. Waffled as much or more than his co-mate (and hopeful VP) John Edward.

Edwards did not come out fighting as was suggested by him earlier in the day. My wife says Edwards is clearly seeking the VP position.

My take on this is that Kerry all but has the nomination sewn up. Unless the Clintons unleashes the press, Kerry will have the nomination. YIPPEE!!

Now Bush is free to attack Hanoi "Baby-killer" John right after Super Tuesday or the nomination. I pray that Bush takes the gloves off for this goon.

12 posted on 02/27/2004 7:28:18 AM PST by sr4402
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Kerry's ranking as the No. 1 Senate liberal...

I guess Kerry really IS the frontrunner...

13 posted on 02/27/2004 7:29:53 AM PST by Choose Ye This Day (I've got a fever...and the only prescription is MORE COWBELL! --rock legend, Bruce Dickinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sr4402
Great post. I'm with you.
14 posted on 02/27/2004 7:31:07 AM PST by truthkeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
I've been saying since the primary voting has started that: Screw all the candidates--hiltery will be chosen at the demonrat confection!!

Remember, you read that here first.

15 posted on 02/27/2004 7:32:24 AM PST by GOPologist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz
I would wait till after the convention. Before you risk Kerry backing out and Hitlery coming in as a more moderate candidate.

I say bring the Hildebeast on NOW.
16 posted on 02/27/2004 7:32:39 AM PST by marktuoni (This space reserved for pithy comments...as yet I have none.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
I've been saying since the primary voting has started that: "Screw all the candidates--hitlery will be chosen at the demonrat confection!! Republcans, please don't waste any money opposing kerry!!"

Remember, you read that here first.

17 posted on 02/27/2004 7:35:35 AM PST by GOPologist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: GOPologist
Hillary doesn't want to run this time. She knows she would lose against Bush.

She wants the Democratic candidate in 2004 to lose but not by a blow out. Then she will have the Democratic field to herself in 2008 and will not have to run against an encumbant Republican.

18 posted on 02/27/2004 7:46:47 AM PST by kennedy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: marktuoni
I say bring the Hildebeast on NOW.

Way too early. She couldn't stand up to the scrutiny. No, she won't emerge until the Convention. That way, she will only have a few weeks of questioning, not months.
19 posted on 02/27/2004 7:52:21 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: kennedy
Any takers on the GOP 2008 nominee???
20 posted on 02/27/2004 8:05:00 AM PST by marktuoni (This space reserved for pithy comments...as yet I have none.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson