[mr.pink]

Kind of off-topic,...

That's not "off topic" at all. I hope Katzenberg or Geffen subsidizes a film that will bridge regilous gaps by and instigating "dialogue" by presenting a straight up view of the Talmud (a tract the study of which we taxpayers subsidize most luxuriantly in terms of populative proportionality) for the edification of American Christians.

I know I'd appreciate it it served up "unvarnished".

[Alouette]

(a tract the study of which we taxpayers subsidize most luxuriantly in terms of populative proportionality)

Care to elaborate on those "most luxuriant subsidies"? I wish I knew where to sign up, cause I ain't been getting my check.

Oh, and, you don't know JACK about the Talmud.

[WOSG]

Those securalists are uninterested in advancing Judaism. they are interested in financing further moral degradation.

You've gotta watch the ol Charlton Heston movies to see Jews of old portrayed well... in films by De Mille... Ironic, aint it?

[Guillermo]

A little research will get one a ton of information.

There is no doubt as to why the Torah is not easily made available to non-Jews. Now, with the internet, it's easier to research it.

[Alouette]

I hope Katzenberg or Geffen subsidizes a film that will bridge regilous gaps by and instigating "dialogue" by presenting a straight up view of the Talmud (a tract the study of which we taxpayers subsidize most luxuriantly in terms of populative proportionality) for the edification of American Christians.

I know I'd appreciate it it served up "unvarnished".

I already made the suggestion in this forum that Spielberg or even Mel Gibson should make an authentic movie about the life of Rabbi Akiva, who was one of the foremost sages of the Talmud.

Being the "unvarnished truth" it would not contain all the "juicy" stuff that you suck up from Michael Hoffman and Israel ("I'm a Commie, but nazis just love me!") Shahak.

[rmlew]

What the bloody hell are you babling about?