Personally, I say repeal 16, 17 and 19 and everything else takes cares of itself. You male chauvinistic pig, you! :^)
Actually, probably not too bad of an idea, and I'll bet that there are some FReeperettes who would probably agree.
Yeah, it's sad to say, but that's no typo. Most of the roots of government-as-nanny/husband can be traced to suffrage. The average psychological profile made it almost inevitable. Women want a safety net, a provider, a protector. Used to be, men provided that. Now the government does, so she can have her career and wear pants during the day too.
I don't mean to tar all with one brush, but by-and-large, men don't vote for a candidate because of his cute dimples (Certain currently shrill cupcakes excepted). Clinton would be a closet-Commie trial lawyer in BFArk if not for the 19th, and you better believe it.