Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Amendments to protect hunting rights on table
Southeast Missourian ^ | Feb 24, 2004 | Marc Powers

Posted on 02/24/2004 5:48:24 PM PST by neverdem

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. -- Fearful that animal rights activists might push for laws that would curtail hunting and fishing in Missouri, some rural lawmakers are seeking constitutional protections for such pastimes.

One proposal, sponsored by state Rep. Jim Whorton, D-Trenton, would guarantee in the state constitution's Bill of Rights the prerogative to hunt, fish and harvest game.

A second proposed constitutional amendment takes a broader approach. It would require any proposal affecting fish, wildlife and forestry management placed on the statewide ballot via initiative petition to win at least two-thirds of the vote to become law.

Under that measure, it would be more difficult to enact conservation laws through initiative referenda than measures related to any other issue, including tax increases.

State Rep. Mike Dethrow, R-Alton, said activist groups have successfully used the initiative process in other states to enact laws that prevent responsible \wildlife management practices.

Dethrow cited a California ballot proposal that outlawed hunting mountain lions.

Although it failed in most of the state, it became law due to strong support in urban areas that didn't have a mountain lion problem. A mountain lion recently killed one person and attacked others in California.

"These issues are best left in the hands of professionals and not those who would manage these resources with the emotion of an initiative petition," Dethrow said.

Conservation-related measures placed on the ballot by the legislature would still require a simple majority to become law.

Both measures, which are co-sponsored by state Rep. Peter Myers, R-Sikeston, were heard last week by the House Conservation and Natural Resources Committee.

If they clear the legislature, they would go on the November ballot and require simple majorities to be ratified.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California; US: Missouri
KEYWORDS: animalrights; bang; banglist; fishing; hunting; wildlifemanagement

1 posted on 02/24/2004 5:48:25 PM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: fourdeuce82d; Travis McGee; Joe Brower
BANG
2 posted on 02/24/2004 5:49:44 PM PST by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *bang_list
Click the Gadsden flag for pro-gun resources!
3 posted on 02/24/2004 6:05:38 PM PST by Joe Brower (The Constitution defines Conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend
ping
4 posted on 02/24/2004 6:09:40 PM PST by Libertarianize the GOP (Ideas have consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; abbi_normal_2; Ace2U; Alamo-Girl; Alas; alfons; alphadog; amom; AndreaZingg; ...
Rights, farms, environment ping.
Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from this list.
I don't get offended if you want to be removed.
5 posted on 02/24/2004 6:12:14 PM PST by farmfriend ( Isaiah 55:10,11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Although it failed in most of the state, it became law due to strong support in urban areas that didn't have a mountain lion problem. A mountain lion recently killed one person and attacked others in California.

These busybody urbanites wouldn't know a raccoon from a rattlesnake. I'd like to see any of them survive a week in the deep wilderness. They'd probably try to pet a badger or play with a bear cub while Mama Bear's nearby.

6 posted on 02/24/2004 6:20:52 PM PST by Morgan's Raider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend
BTTT!!!!!!!
7 posted on 02/25/2004 3:10:28 AM PST by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Morgan's Raider
The urbanites had the votes to defeat the first CCW initiative. We don't need to give them any opportunity to use their block of votes against hunters or any other rural issue like highway funding.
8 posted on 02/26/2004 5:01:56 PM PST by o_zarkman44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson