Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

County to issue same-sex marriage licenses (NEW MEXICO TODAY 2/20/04)
AP via News Channel 15 wane.com ^ | 2/20/2004

Posted on 02/20/2004 9:55:00 AM PST by cyncooper

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-174 next last
To: mewzilla
c#52
61 posted on 02/20/2004 10:43:27 AM PST by Southack (Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
I'll guess that you agree with the article at the end of the link you posted. If not, then the following isn't meant for you. :)
______________________

Well, then, how exactly is the President of the United States supposed to make a county official do what he wants? This goober's decision is wrong, to be sure, but he isn't breaking the law, either NM or US. Ergo, W can't send in the National Guard.

Now, if the Constitutional amendment is passed, we have a whole different kettle of fish. W does support that. That is about the extent of his power in this matter, though.
62 posted on 02/20/2004 10:44:59 AM PST by Constantine XIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
State law defines marriage as a civil contract between contracting parties. It doesn't mention gender.

The NM license may have a greater chance of being legally legitimate. If so, gays could wed in NM and return home to be recognized under the "full faith and credit clause."

Expect a stampede soon.

63 posted on 02/20/2004 10:45:05 AM PST by umgud (speaking strictly as an infidel,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Southack
I thought of that, too. First thing I thought of was Richardson. We'll see.
64 posted on 02/20/2004 10:45:07 AM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper

65 posted on 02/20/2004 10:45:40 AM PST by Caleb1411
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian_Baldwin
What are you going to do? Withhold the vote you didn't give him last time?

Besides, as we speak he is going to San Francisco and then New Mexico and then Massachusetts (Yeeeeaaaaagh!) to personally machine-gun the offenders where they stand.

66 posted on 02/20/2004 10:45:56 AM PST by AmishDude (When you use sarcasm, use all you can muster!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
No joke. What part of ENUMERATED POWERS don't these people understand? W isn't Clinton.
67 posted on 02/20/2004 10:45:59 AM PST by Constantine XIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper; Brian_Baldwin
"To: Brian_Baldwin
I see you have no answer to my question: What would you have him do. Typical. Huff and puff away Brian, and toss insults as you do it. Makes you feel all he-man like I would guess."

Brian will fall for Governor Richardson's ploy. Gov Richardson will smash down this same-sex marriage license in order to sucker people like Brian into thinking that Dems are against same-sex marriage...because Gov Richardson wants to be the VP candidate for the Dems this year.

68 posted on 02/20/2004 10:46:10 AM PST by Southack (Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
She made the decision after asking for an opinion from the county attorney, who said New Mexico law isn't clear on the issue. He also says refusing to issue marriage licenses to gay couples could open the county to legal action.

Do ya think he might've considered that issuing licenses to gay couples might also open the county to legal action? You can pretty well bet that it will. But, of course, this only reveals his true intentions...

69 posted on 02/20/2004 10:46:21 AM PST by Poseidon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
...the county attorney...said New Mexico law isn't clear on the issue. He also says refusing to issue marriage licenses to gay couples could open the county to legal action.

Gee. Issuing marriage licenses to homosexual couples could also open the county to legal action. In fact, I'd say it's a sure bet.

70 posted on 02/20/2004 10:47:13 AM PST by PeoplesRepublicOfWashington
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian_Baldwin
This is spreading, and Bush isn’t doing crap. I figured the so-called Governor wouldn’t do anything anytime soon, but I expect the President to act, and he isn’t, instead we all hear about the plan.

What would you have him do? Throw some money at it? Seems to be the going standard for the Republican party these days.

The President should not be doing anything, nor should anyone in the general government. This is a state issue, misreadings of the worthless 14th Amendment notwithstanding, that is covered by the 10th

71 posted on 02/20/2004 10:50:28 AM PST by billbears (Deo Vindice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: cspackler
It probably doesn't prohibit someone from marrying their sheep, either.

A sheep is not, and could not be, recoginzed as being able to take part in a contract. A sheep is property.

72 posted on 02/20/2004 10:51:17 AM PST by templar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
These people are so incredibly stupid it is beyond belief. Think about it. If this were just going on in one place, it would generate a discussion, but by using such cynical tactics (in MA having a deadline before a const. amend. can be passed, in NM waiting until the legislature is out of session) and ratcheting this up, all that will build is resentment.

Also, you don't want to champion gay marriage in the year a Republican gets a landslide. They want to make this part of the election discussion, but (1) Kerry will not go there, lest he be trounced and (2) Bush has both the anti-gay-marriage angle and the law-and-order angle.

73 posted on 02/20/2004 10:52:35 AM PST by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
Hey...look at the bright side...all the queers will be leaving my state to "join" each other in the queer states....GOOD!...keep them...don't want to be around them and with any luck they will increase the Aids outbreak in the "communities" and desolve themselves quicker...
Sorry to be so blunt...but I've had enough!
74 posted on 02/20/2004 10:54:10 AM PST by Hotdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
This has become an election issue for sure. When cities, towns, etc. begin to break established laws, they are setting this country down tyranny road. It must be stopped. The sudden 'we can do what we want' attitude has me very concerned for our country.
75 posted on 02/20/2004 10:56:24 AM PST by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cspackler
I love the extreme leaps of logic that some people make.

I also loved this quote from a recent episode of :aw & Order:

"Let them marry... Why shouldn't they be as miserable as the rest of us?"
76 posted on 02/20/2004 10:59:28 AM PST by Lunatic Fringe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: PeoplesRepublicOfWashington
I hear this only on a local radio show here yesterday. Five queer "couples" tried to get licenses here in South Carolina last week. They told them they couldn't give them a license because of state law.
77 posted on 02/20/2004 10:59:38 AM PST by Hillarys Gate Cult (Proud member of the right wing extremist Neanderthals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
I just relocated to New Mexico a couple of months ago, and have volunteered to help out the Bush/Cheney '04 NM campaign. This news makes me even more enthusiastic about the upcoming battle.
78 posted on 02/20/2004 11:00:23 AM PST by Wordsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
look y'all, several thousand gay couples are already married and the world didn't end.. maybe it just ain't such a big deal.
79 posted on 02/20/2004 11:00:56 AM PST by gawd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gawd
OK, dear, set aside the issue at hand and just address roge "officials" circumventing of the law in conjunction with sneeky tactics.

Do you have any problem with that?
80 posted on 02/20/2004 11:04:20 AM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-174 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson