Skip to comments.
CA: Thanks to a semicolon, gays and lesbians keep marrying in San Francisco
AP via San Francisco Chronicle ^
| Feb. 17, 2004
| DAVID KRAVETS and LISA LEFF
Posted on 02/17/2004 5:04:39 PM PST by calcowgirl
Edited on 04/13/2004 2:45:48 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
SAN FRANCISCO - Two judges delayed taking any action Tuesday to shut down San Francisco's same-sex wedding spree, citing court procedures as they temporarily rebuffed conservative groups enraged that the city's liberal politicians had already married almost 2,400 gay and lesbian couples.
(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: civilunion; gavinnewsom; homosexual; homosexualagenda; lawsuits; marriage; samesexmarriage; sf; stunt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-112 next last
A semicolon... unbelievable.
To: calcowgirl
Homosexuals and colons go together.
2
posted on
02/17/2004 5:07:11 PM PST
by
dinok
To: calcowgirl
Thank God they didn't have a mis-spelling!
To: calcowgirl
A semicolon is much more important than Gavin Newsom breaking the law.
To: calcowgirl
It's not a semicolon issue, that's just an excuse. If the semicolon is corrected it will be your using the wrong adjective next.
To: calcowgirl
A lot of guys in Frisco are lucky if they have any fraction of a colon.
6
posted on
02/17/2004 5:08:05 PM PST
by
Argus
To: calcowgirl
A semicolon... unbelievable. Was the judge referring to a semicolon or a seman colon?
7
posted on
02/17/2004 5:08:25 PM PST
by
Go Gordon
To: BlessedByLiberty
Gavin Newsome is a semicolon and he is definitely in the wrong place.
To: calcowgirl
It's hard for me believe the petition did not request "or such other relief as this Court may grant."
This would, I believe, permit the Judge to grant whatever lawful relief he saw fit, whether it was requested or not.
9
posted on
02/17/2004 5:09:56 PM PST
by
Petronski
(John Kerry looks like . . . like . . . weakness.)
To: calcowgirl
All he had to do was strike out the semi-colon with his pen, interlineate the word "or", hand it to the attorneys to initial, and enter the order.
At least, that's all he'd have to do in Virginia.
If hand written interlineations are a violation of California law, if I had been one of the lawyers, I would have called my secretary on a cell phone and instructed her to retype that one page and fax it to judge's chambers ASAP. Total turn-around time, 15 minutes, max. A secretary on her toes could do it in 5 minutes.
To: dinok; calcowgirl
Isn't there something tragically ironic about the judge's statement?
11
posted on
02/17/2004 5:10:16 PM PST
by
NonValueAdded
("America will never seek a permission slip to defend the security of our people." GWB 1/20/04)
To: calcowgirl
Is is?
12
posted on
02/17/2004 5:11:30 PM PST
by
gitmo
(Who is John Galt?)
To: Go Gordon
It was probably a high colon-ick.
To: calcowgirl
Just like his grandaddy. The nut doesn't fall far from the tree.
To: calcowgirl
I have never heard of a judge not ruling on a petition before based on a semicolon. The plaintiffs should have told the judge we will make immediate change and refile. NOW RULE
To: NonValueAdded
"The way you've written this it has a semicolon where it should have the word 'or'," the judge told them. "I don't have the authority to issue it under these circumstances." Isn't there something tragically ironic about the judge's statement?
You mean kinda like, I only have the authority to overrule written laws, the constitution and write my own laws as I see them, but I don't have REAL POWER the kind it takes to remove a semicolon and replace it with "or."
To: CobaltBlue
Yes, I don't get this. I was a legal secretary in CA for 10 years and there were times attorneys would draft a handwritten stipulation in court and have it signed! If they were arguing about that semicolon all day, there's no reason on earth a new one couldn't have been printed and messengered to the courthouse, if the judge refused to strike it out himself (which I believe he could do...).
To: calcowgirl
I heard on the radio (special report from ABC news during the Roger Hedgecock show) that the 2nd ruling from the Superior Court is to stop issuing [fake] marriage licenses.
This contradicts the AP report that there's no ruling, so who knows who is right.
18
posted on
02/17/2004 5:16:25 PM PST
by
heleny
(No on propositions 55, 56, 57, 58)
Comment #19 Removed by Moderator
To: calcowgirl
Those cornhole judges probably have a colon the size of a semi.
20
posted on
02/17/2004 5:17:33 PM PST
by
dc-zoo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-112 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson