Skip to comments.
California Governor Urged to Arrest Mayor of San Francisco
Agape Press ^
| 1/16/04
| Fred Jackson, Allie Martin, and Jody Brown
Posted on 02/16/2004 2:05:54 PM PST by truthandlife
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-172 next last
To: truthandlife
Don't hold your breath.
2
posted on
02/16/2004 2:07:47 PM PST
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
To: Blood of Tyrants
Agreed, but wouldn't it be nice?
3
posted on
02/16/2004 2:12:24 PM PST
by
Bikers4Bush
(Flood waters rising, heading for more conservative ground. Write in Tancredo in 04'!)
To: truthandlife
I agree. Time for Arnold to do his job.
4
posted on
02/16/2004 2:12:45 PM PST
by
inquest
(The only problem with partisanship is that it leads to bipartisanship)
To: truthandlife
You can bet if the conservative Californians had stood by a real conservative ie., McLintock, this would be handled very quickly.
To: truthandlife
A small step in the right direction would be a statement condemning the illegal and immoral actions of the SF mayor. How about it Arnold?
6
posted on
02/16/2004 2:19:01 PM PST
by
claudiustg
(Go Sharon! Go Bush!)
To: inquest; Integrityrocks; truthandlife; Bikers4Bush
The same standard should be applied here as was applied to Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore.
Justice Moore was removed from the court when he supposedly defied the law by refusing to remove the Ten Commandments monument from state property.
7
posted on
02/16/2004 2:20:36 PM PST
by
Liz
To: Integrityrocks
I don't think governors indict people. That is the job of Attorney General Bill Lockyer - the man who would be governor.
8
posted on
02/16/2004 2:22:55 PM PST
by
BigBobber
To: Integrityrocks
Who the hell defines what a REAL conservative is? You!!!!!!!
9
posted on
02/16/2004 2:23:27 PM PST
by
cksharks
(quote from)
To: truthandlife
There's no punitive article in the relevant California law.
10
posted on
02/16/2004 2:24:15 PM PST
by
Poohbah
("Would you mind not shooting at the thermonuclear weapons?" -- Maj. Vic Deakins, USAF)
To: inquest
Do you think that he meant it when he took an oath to uphold the laws of the state of California?
11
posted on
02/16/2004 2:29:29 PM PST
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
To: truthandlife
Emails and links to the Governor's office? please?
This is perfect for a freep.
To: Poohbah
From the CLP letter, as quoted in the article:
"California Penal Code section 115 prohibits the knowing procurement of any false or forged instrument to be filed or recorded in any public office, making such an act a felony punishable by up to three (3) years in prison. Since Mayor Newsom has procured approximately 96 such false certificates as of yesterday [Thursday], he may face up to 288 years in prison."
13
posted on
02/16/2004 2:47:35 PM PST
by
inquest
(The only problem with partisanship is that it leads to bipartisanship)
To: claudiustg
A small step in the right direction would be a statement condemning the illegal and immoral actions of the SF mayor. How about it Arnold? Small step hell!
Revoke the damn city charter!
14
posted on
02/16/2004 2:47:43 PM PST
by
navyblue
To: Blood of Tyrants
I don't really care whether he meant it. He took the oath, now he needs to be held to it.
15
posted on
02/16/2004 2:48:30 PM PST
by
inquest
(The only problem with partisanship is that it leads to bipartisanship)
To: truthandlife
The mayor needs to be charged for each count of gays being "married" at city hall.
16
posted on
02/16/2004 2:50:47 PM PST
by
freeangel
(freeangel)
To: BigBobber
I don't think governors indict people. That is the job of Attorney General Bill Lockyer - the man who would be governor. However, if a government is flagrantly violating the law, the governor has the power to send the National Guard in, as happened in the integration struggles in Alabama. Wouldn't it be an entertaining sight to see troops rolling up on S.F. City Hall?
To: BigBobber
Apparently Lockyear was consulted prior to the mayor acting.
So does this mean that the California assault weapons ban is null and void as it is in violation of the U.S. constituiton which is the supreme law of the land.
Lockyear can not enforce it if he does not enforce the law in this case.
But knowing liberals they will pick and choose which laws they follow.
To: truthandlife
Well, Arnie did say he was a
social liberal didn't he?
Maybe now we'll find out just how liberal he really is.
19
posted on
02/16/2004 2:55:21 PM PST
by
navyblue
To: truthandlife
The media's filming it, everyones discussing its merits nonchalantly, meanwhile...
This mayor has been BREAKING THE LAW for days! What is going on? Does anyone in CA have a spine?
BTW I DO NOT want to see anymore kissing of the bride/ groom whoever is whom on TV again.
God help us.
20
posted on
02/16/2004 2:56:26 PM PST
by
bluegrass
(tit for tat)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-172 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson