Also, not to defend the judge but there is a factual error in that Rapkin did not release JS from custody but rather refused to issue a warrant. What Rapkin did is reprehensible and a pattern if what O'Reilly says is true, but I want to know who put JS on parole instead of behind bars originally. Rapkin was 13th in a line of judicial errors.
I am not positive in this, but I think what happened is as follows--
The parole officer sent a note to Rapkin saying Smith didn't pay a court fine (fee?) and tested positive for drugs (two violations). It was then up to the judge to decide whether Smith should return to jail. The judge did nothing (never sent him back, never had a hearing about it which is SOP) so they had to let him go.