Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tailgunner Joe
Inevitably, he argued, China would be in a conflict with the United States. China's enormous population made this likely and worrisome. Adm. Moorer's concern was that Chinese leaders might some day believe they could absorb a nuclear attack, lose 200 million people and still have 800 million left.

The U.S. could not withstand such a loss. China's population made naught the concept of mutually assured destruction ? which had helped maintain lukewarm peace with Russia for decades.

Population centers. They're no more immune to 1000+ nukes than anyone else.

6 posted on 02/10/2004 4:59:24 PM PST by Gunslingr3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Gunslingr3
Population centers. They're no more immune to 1000+ nukes than anyone else.

True, but the late Admiral is absolutely right that we have to adapt our western-tuned minds to get in the minds of people who do think of their people as "masses" and plan their military strategy as such.

I think that MAD kept the world stable during the second half of the 20th century because the Soviets and the US were basically humane people, each believing very strongly in our respective systems.

He correctly foresaw the next challenge for the US: how to defeat the new bear, the new bear that doesn't value life the way we do.

11 posted on 02/10/2004 9:28:18 PM PST by krb (the statement on the other side of this tagline is false)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson