To: blam
Mansoor also said in mid-December that by the State of the Union address, we'd have evidence of wmd's in Iraq. Mansoor says all kinds of things. I just keep waiting for one of them to be correct. He's Rita Cosby sans "sources."
11 posted on
02/09/2004 3:47:15 PM PST by
Endeavor
To: Endeavor
Maybe we do know where the WMDs are and are keeping them under surveilance so we can track them. Or wait for some big fish to attempt to retrieve them. There's a lot going on in Iraq that we are unaware of. If we put our every move on TV for the enemy to see we will never catch them. The element of surprise will be non existent.
To: Endeavor; Dog Gone; All
Mansoor also said in mid-December that by the State of the Union address, we'd have evidence of wmd's in Iraq.
~Endeavor
He cries wolf a lot, but I haven't seen no steenkin' wolf.
~Dog Gone
There's a reason why we "haven't seen" the evidence.
Strategery
Once Kerry starts echoing the screaming Gore, but not before, will the real salvos start. There will be a "paradigm shift" (henceforth to be known as a "Paridigum Shift") in the WOT/Iraq and the opposition research attacks on Kerry will be devastating. My main concern is that Bush waits for the right timing; he's doing a good job of it now.
Notice the "emboldenment" of the Rat attacks after the "weak" MTP performance.
Drawing them in...
Just like we're drawing in the terrorists....
Strategery. Keep the faith.
60 posted on
02/09/2004 4:28:57 PM PST by
motzman
(OBL dead or captured by 10/31/04)
To: Endeavor
Mansoor=Debka.
68 posted on
02/09/2004 4:39:16 PM PST by
Huck
(Where there's smoke, there's mirrors.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson