1 posted on
02/09/2004 3:38:15 PM PST by
blam
To: blam
Myanmar is a definite possibility, as is Sudan.
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Ping. Did you see this?
Mansoor said that 'special teams' were on the ground in Pakistan securing their nuclear facilities...or, something close to that.
3 posted on
02/09/2004 3:39:58 PM PST by
blam
To: blam
Gee,I cant wait till we find the WMDs on West 57th street....
4 posted on
02/09/2004 3:41:10 PM PST by
woofie
To: blam
He might be credible on the history of this--but I have put him in the Debka class..Maybe right maybe wrong on most things.
To: blam
This guy is always hyping one thing or another. Is he even credible?
To: blam
I saw him too, I allways listen to Ijaz because he's allways several steps ahead of the game.
I think there is real reason for concern over "dirty bombs". Terrorists know they have to get rid of them before they're caught with them. The prefered method of getting rid of them will be using them.
7 posted on
02/09/2004 3:42:45 PM PST by
cripplecreek
(you win wars by making the other dumb SOB die for his country)
To: blam; Dog; Dog Gone; BOBTHENAILER; Grampa Dave; Cap Huff
8 posted on
02/09/2004 3:43:03 PM PST by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(The terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States - and war is what they got!!!!)
To: blam; Dog; swarthyguy
Saudi didn't pay for that program for nothing...
19 posted on
02/09/2004 3:53:36 PM PST by
Shermy
To: Dark Wing
Sounds like hype.
Radiological device = chemical explosives spread some sort of radioactive powder around. The radioactive energy would generally come from radioactive sources used in medicine and industry.
"Dirty bomb" = an incomplete chain reaction in weapons grade fissionable material of some sort instantly cooks the relatively inert fissionables into an awful witches' brew of highly radioactive, short-half life, isotopes while releasing enough energy to "powder" and spread them around a moderately wide area.
There might be some xSoviet nukes around whose fissionables were cooked 1989-1991 and so could serve as "dirty bombs", but none would be "suitcase" nukes which require lots of expensive maintenance as well as the finest grade of xSoviet fissionables.
IMO this is just the press being clueless, and careless with terminology. I remember one of them in 1991 labeling as a tank what was really a Saudi street sweeper truck used to clean foreign objects off airfield runways.
23 posted on
02/09/2004 3:57:23 PM PST by
Thud
To: StarFan; Dutchy; Timesink; Gracey; Alamo-Girl; RottiBiz; bamabaseballmom; FoxGirl; Mr. Bob; ...
FoxFan ping!
Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my FoxFan list. *Warning: This can be a high-volume ping list at times.
43 posted on
02/09/2004 4:16:15 PM PST by
nutmeg
(Tick off a terrorist - Vote for George W. Bush!)
To: blam; Poohbah
Any adjustments in your feelings about this issue, Poohbah?
I realize the physics etc. doesn't change.
48 posted on
02/09/2004 4:19:34 PM PST by
Quix
(Choose this day whom U will serve: Shrillery & demonic goons or The King of Kings and Lord of Lords)
To: blam
if he had this much info, would the govt ask him to shut up or might he be a conduit between the govt and the people?
56 posted on
02/09/2004 4:26:56 PM PST by
InvisibleChurch
(Remember, God made you special and He loves you very much!)
To: blam
More of Mansoor and his unimpeachable sources.
Saudi is widely reported as a recipient. Who else, Syria, Egypt?
57 posted on
02/09/2004 4:27:07 PM PST by
fso301
To: blam
More of Mansoor and his unimpeachable sources.
Saudi is widely reported as a recipient. Who else, Syria, Egypt?
58 posted on
02/09/2004 4:27:07 PM PST by
fso301
To: blam
Somebody's gotta' do it...
"KHAAANNNN!"
To: blam
bump
90 posted on
02/09/2004 5:04:30 PM PST by
txhurl
To: blam
"He seemed to confirm that the terrorist have 'dirty bombs' and are anxious to use them......."
Do most people really know what a "dirty bomb" is? Basically, a dirty bomb is a conventional bomb that spreads radioactive contamination (RC) --- basically it creates a mess. Does the RC kill you? Not really, unless you get a real face full, or if you absorb stuff like radioactive iodine, cesium, etc.
Basically, a "dirty bomb" just messes you over and scares people. I am more afraid of nerve gas and other chemical and biological nasties!
118 posted on
02/09/2004 5:29:18 PM PST by
TRY ONE
(NUKE the unborn gay whales!)
To: blam
bttt
139 posted on
02/09/2004 8:33:13 PM PST by
lainde
(Heads up...We're coming and we've got tongue blades!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson