[AlbertWang]

AND A NOTE ABOUT SADDAM'S VICTIMS
Since the 1980s Saddam Hussein has killed about two million people. That's about 10 times more than the number of people killed by Slobodan Milosevic. Clinton used the U.S. Military against Milosevic in the 1990s citing human rights concerns. The lesson we're learning here is that it's OK for a Democratic president to attack a bloody dictator who has killed 200,000 people, but who presents no threat whatsoever to the rest of the world on purely human rights concerns; but it is definitely not OK for a Republican president to use troops to unseat a dictator who has killed two million people, and who may have the weapons needed to kill millions more. Yeah .. I think I get it now. Makes perfect sense to me.




Does Mike Moore know about this? Why isn't he upset about the actions of his buddy Saddam?

[Austin Willard Wright]

I have a strange idea for you: Perhaps Clinton was wrong in the Kosovo war and Dubya was wrong in the Iraq war. Could it be that *both* were wrong?

[samanella]

Sadaam was a one man WMD.