Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anybody Seen America? (Entire United States Expatriates - Fred Left Behind)
Fred on Everything ^ | 2/2/04 | Fred Reed

Posted on 02/02/2004 10:49:54 AM PST by Rytwyng

Mail arrives, telling me that by going to Mexico I have sold out, fled, abandoned the United States. I’m a coward, some of my correspondents say, and a traitor, just like Lord Haw Haw, Kim Philby, Jane Fonda. I’m probably a devotee of Quisling. (Actually I’ve never quizzled in my life.)

(OK, OK, I’m sorry.)

Anyway, they’re upset, which is irrational. They think that just because I went to Mexico, I left the US. They don’t understand. I didn’t leave the United States. It left me. It was a bait-and-switch operation. I signed on to one country, and they slipped another in under me. I want my money back.

In the country where I grew up, if you found a naked intruder in your daughter’s bedroom with a Bowie knife and a hard-on, you shot him and arranged to have the rugs cleaned. The sheriff wasn’t greatly interested and the country prosecutor didn’t see anything to prosecute. The scum floating on the gene pool wasn’t a protected species. It wasn’t the driving engine of the culture. It was just scum.

Today you would be charged with the use of excessive force. The cadaver’s family would sue. They would end up with your house unless they just ran you broke with legal bills. The outcome would depend on the racial make-up of you, the intruder, and the jury. Your daughter would be married with grandchildren before the courts reached any conclusion.

Think I’m exaggerating? When I used to have the police beat for the Washington Times in the Yankee capital, the cops told me, dead serious, that if I ever shot an intruder, I should shoot him again to make sure: You can’t afford to have two stories, they said, especially if he’s black which, in Washington, was a foregone conclusion. They’ll hang you, said the cops.

In the country I grew up in, you got on an airplane by walking up these funny little steps with wheels on them. Then you sat down. That’s all you did. I know, I know: You don’t believe this. It’s true. You just walked on. Further, the stewardesses were not merely civil but—so help me—friendly. Flying was actually enjoyable. The seats were big enough that you didn’t sit with your knees beside your ears and your feet in your pockets.

Now, getting aboard is like going into max security at some ghastly penitentiary. I once flew a bit around the old Soviet Union, as distinct from the new one, on a junket. Security was less oppressive, though the food was marginally worse unless you liked green chicken. The service was just as sullen.

Maybe that’s what I miss most about the Old Country. People were courteous. They could afford to be because everyone else was too. It’s hard to be pleasant when the odds are even that the next person you deal with will be an ill-mannered lout who knows he can get away with it.

I think people were courteous also because they lived in an agreeable country and were pretty happy with things. The new country seems angry—quietly so, not sure what to do about it, but looking for someone to hit.

Yet further still, in the old country they didn’t have these funny little Japanese cars with itsy-bitsy four-bangers. Nope. They had great virile monsters thirty feet long with eight huge cylinders like buckets. A dog could have slept in them. Sure, those rocket-barges were probably ridiculous and left a trail of parts that fell off because quality control wasn’t that great, but they were real cars. They embodied a spirit I liked. Today cars seem to be designed with transvestites in mind.

The Old Country the music was vibrant, vigorous, much of it springing from the great black bluesmen of Mississippi and then Chicago, some of it from the mountains and the jazz dens of the big cities. In the music of the new country, the whites whine and the blacks grunt angrily. From Tampa Red to rap is a long way down.

In the country I signed on to, things worked on the principle of individual responsibility. If you robbed a bank, which people generally didn’t, everyone figured you did it because you decided to, and you went to jail and everyone was satisfied, except you, which was the idea. Most people knew how to behave, and did. It saved a lot on police departments and you could walk around at night.

In the new country of course everything is somebody else’s fault, unless you are a white male, in which case everything is your fault. Never mind that if it weren’t for white males everybody else would be living on low-hanging fruit and saying “ugga-wugga” because they couldn’t figure out how to make a hemi-head big-block to crash into things with. Or figure out how to make anything else.

In the old country, the government was pretty much benign or actually useful. It built roads and largely left you alone. The public schools were not great but neither were they terrible. People ran their own lives. The federal government tended to be somewhere else, which was a splendid place for it, and you mostly didn’t notice.

In the country that is now where America used to be, the government is the cause of most major problems instead of a solution, however inefficient, to a fair number of them. The government keeps you from educating your children, holds standards down, prevents you from hiring the best people you can find to work in your business. It won’t allow local jurisdictions to control crime, prevents localities from enforcing such moral standards as they see fit, virtually illegalizes the religion, of most of the population, and generally won’t permit people to live as they like.

Now, I used to be fond of the United States. Granted, I wasn’t much of a patriot. The word nowadays seems to mean one who doesn’t so much love his country as to dislike other people’s. I figured live and let live. A lot of other countries struck me as fine places. But America was my favorite. It just suited me. I liked the people in their wild variety and the countryside and the music and the brash independence. It wasn’t perfect. Still, given the sorry baseline for comportment in human agglomerations, it was about as good as you could get.

I’m still fond of the United States. I just can’t find it.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: america; expatriates; fredreed; mexico
"I’m still fond of the United States. I just can’t find it."

My sentiments exactly.

1 posted on 02/02/2004 10:49:55 AM PST by Rytwyng
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Rockitz
ping
2 posted on 02/02/2004 10:54:16 AM PST by Rytwyng
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rytwyng
...The new country seems angry—quietly so, not sure what to do about it, but looking for someone to hit...

3 posted on 02/02/2004 11:02:53 AM PST by the gillman@blacklagoon.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rytwyng
Think I’m exaggerating? When I used to have the police beat for the Washington Times in the Yankee capital, the cops told me, dead serious, that if I ever shot an intruder, I should shoot him again to make sure: You can’t afford to have two stories, they said, especially if he’s black which, in Washington, was a foregone conclusion. They’ll hang you, said the cops.

Of course you are not allowed to own a gun in the District of Columbia.... Has Fred really decamped to Mexico permanently?
4 posted on 02/02/2004 11:43:15 AM PST by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rytwyng
You!
You there!
Stop that whining and get back in line!
5 posted on 02/02/2004 12:19:15 PM PST by rockrr ("Just because I'm paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get me")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rytwyng
bump
6 posted on 02/02/2004 12:32:00 PM PST by RippleFire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan
When I used to have the police beat for the Washington Times ...

Of course you are not allowed to own a gun in the District of Columbia....

Gun control is NEVER 100%, not in any country in the world -- there is always some elite class of persons that is eligible to get a gun permit regardless of how severe the restrictions may be for the average citizen. Reporters, as members of the almighty press, are part of that elite class -- along with politicians, actors, etc -- for whom the exceptions are made.

But normally, only liberals are allowed to have guns in such places. I guess in Fred's case they made a mistake.

7 posted on 02/02/2004 1:07:49 PM PST by Rytwyng
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com
...The new country seems angry—quietly so, not sure what to do about it, but looking for someone to hit...

Damn, that's a strong statement but seems true. Last Saturday we went to an empty movie theater, perhaps only 5 percent full. We sat with no one else around for several rows. Then a couple sat right behind us, and the one behind me starts kicking the seat. After 10 minutes of this, I stood up and faced them, saying out loud so everyone could hear that either they were going to move, or have to stop kicking the seat or they were going to have to deal with me and what I would do to them. They muttered okay. I stared at them for a minute before sitting down and didn't hear a peep from them again. With all the seats available in the theater, why do idiots purposely sit behind others and not realize when they're disturbing someone?

In the old days, most people went out of their way to accomodate others, even graciously inviting others to go before them. That mode of life is disappearing, and more people are getting angry (including me).

8 posted on 02/02/2004 5:20:03 PM PST by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: Rytwyng
Having once been on the opposite side of such a situation, I have to say, you were very unfair. I was on a date, at a restauraunt, and was playing "footsie" under the table with my girlfriend. I really, truly had no idea whatosever, that the flimsier-than-normal back of the booth transmitted my every movement to the customer behind me... until suddenly, he angrily shoved back at me and moved it about a foot. I was quite rightly furious -- there I was enjoying an evening out with my girl, and suddenly *boom* -- some stranger decides to shove me out of the blue.

Sorry you had a situation where you didn't realize you were bothering someone else. But, in my case, I don't think I was unfair. Unlike your situation, I didn't use physical force. I verbalized to the other folks to cut it out or else. And you were going to beat this other guy to a pulp when you caused the situation in the first place? You are the one that is supposed to let it go and walk away. In my case, I didn't use physical force when the other couple caused the problem. Oh, incidentally, I was armed at the time. Physical height doesn't necessarily matter in altercations. And I always try to talk out a situation first, and never throw the first punch.

10 posted on 02/03/2004 3:34:08 PM PST by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: roadcat
And you were going to beat this other guy to a pulp...

Of course not. But I was tempted. You would have been, too, if you'd been slammed that hard from behind, without warning and without having the slightest advance knowledge that you had, in some very minor way, allegedly provoked his assault. All I knew in that moment was that I'd been slammed, out of the blue, and then shouted at, by some hostile stranger. My self-control saved him -- but there are a lot of hot-heads out there who would have just gone for it, and he'd have been in trouble. If he keeps on acting like that, someday he WILL do it to the wrong guy.

...when you caused the situation in the first place?

'Scuse me, but, a wiggly chair does NOT justify slamming a wooden cubicle back into somebody from behind, without warning. My accidental and unconscious act of irritating him -- which I would have happily stopped if he'd just SAID something -- does not come within a thousand miles of justifying his assault. As far as I'm concerned, his reaction was so out-of-proportion to the situation that it was, for all practical purposes, an unprovoked attack.

Unlike your situation, I didn't use physical force. I verbalized to the other folks to cut it out or else

Are you sure they were AWARE they were bothering you, before you jumped down their throats? Maybe they were just resting their feet and - as in my case -- didn't realize that the vibrations were being transmitted. Did you give them the benefit of the doubt and offer them a polite warning first?

Oh, incidentally, I was armed at the time.

So you go around shouting at people, and threatening them like this:

"they were going to have to deal with me and what I would do to them"

.... while relying on the gun in your pocket to protect you in case someone calls your bluff? Wow. Do you realize how bad this sounds? You're lucky you didn't get your CCW revoked.

11 posted on 02/03/2004 11:07:01 PM PST by Rytwyng
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson