Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BadAndy
Is the sand thing feasible? Melting temp of sand is ~ 1500 C so the temp must have been less than that. How far can you catapult sand anyway? In any case I would expect rapid thermal loss from small particles moving through air making such a weapon ineffective. This could be an interesting project.

I too was intrigued by the idea of tossing burning sand at the enemy. And as far as the feasability, the first thing I thought of was running barefoot across the burning sand of a beach.

Also, there is the semi-conductive property of silicon, making it able to retain heat more efficiently than, say iron or aluminum. I think it would work.

17 posted on 01/30/2004 11:32:07 AM PST by FierceDraka (Service and Glory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: FierceDraka; BadAndy

The density of Quartz (primary constituent of most beach sand) is about 2.63 (grams/cubic centimeter). That means it's 2.63 times as dense as water. Think how well water holds heat, and then consider a much denser material. That stuff, heated to, say, about 800 degrees (which is about all that's practical using the method described) would cause horrible burns. Ouch.


26 posted on 06/06/2005 11:18:59 AM PDT by Renfield (Philosophy chair at the University of Wallamalloo!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: FierceDraka; BadAndy
They also probably clumped the sand together somehow (is it naturally sticky at those temperatures?) and tossed potato-sized clods at the enemy. The clods would have broken up on impact and showered the opponent with burning sticky sand particles.
29 posted on 06/06/2005 3:40:15 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson