Bringint the Bible back to School

Washington, D.C.’s National Press Club was the setting July 25 for an important announcement that is likely to have far-reaching impact on the students attending our nation’s public schools and, perhaps, the future of America itself.

The National Council on Bible Curriculum in Public Schools (NCBCPS) is a proactive organization based in Greensboro, North Carolina, that is devoted to returning the study of the Bible as an elective course to junior and senior high school classrooms nationwide. Its president, Elizabeth Ridenour, says tremendous progress has been made in this effort, but there have also been threats along the way from organizations like the American Civil Liberties Union and People for the American Way who vehemently oppose even the mention of God’s name in a classroom. During those confrontations, NCBCPS has been assisted primarily by the American Family Association Center for Law and Policy (CLP).

The working relationship between the two entities has flourished, and along with it AFA’s desire to help NCBCPS achieve its goal. As a result, the Washington press conference was the forum through which Steve Crampton, chief counsel for CLP, made public the fact that AFA intends to more actively support the NCBCPS efforts and play an even more prominent role in the future by: 1) providing legal services free of charge to any school districts sued by the ACLU or others like it who attempt to intimidate or block the districts from using the Bible curriculum, and 2) networking and using its various media outlets to increase awareness of the curriculum and the relative ease with which it can be introduced into a school district’s curriculum.

Ridenour expressed appreciation for the attendance and support of several dignitaries at the press conference, including Vietnam War icon General John Singlaub, actress Jane Russell and Notre Dame University law professor Gerard Bradley. As spokespersons for the NCBCPS, they were each given the opportunity to express their support for the Bible curriculum. Other national spokespersons include Dr. D. James Kennedy of Coral Ridge Ministries; Dr. Bill Bright of Campus Crusade; Joyce Meyer of Joyce Meyer Ministries; David Barton of the WallBuilders Ministry; Dr. John Hagee of John Hagee Ministries; actors Chuck Norris and Dean Jones; and Captain Scott O’Grady, USAF, who was shot down over Bosnia and later rescued.

“The Bible curriculum itself is geared toward conveying the content of the Bible in a historical and literary context,” Ridenour said. “It is not our intent to indoctrinate students into a particular religion. Instead, we want to equip them with a fundamental understanding of the influence of the Bible on history, law, and our American culture, and help them gain insight into the thoughts of our country’s Founding Fathers so they can understand the Bible’s influence on those men’s views of human rights.

“Sadly, the rhetoric and misunderstanding these past several years have convinced some school administrators and teachers that it is unconstitutional to teach anything about the Bible in today’s public schools. The fact is, the Supreme Court has ruled that it is constitutional when taught within the proper context. And that is what we do.”

The success rate for putting the Bible curriculum back into schools is impressive. Ninety-two percent of the school districts that have been asked to implement it as an elective class have voted it in. At this writing, it has been placed in 200 school districts in 33 states, with more than 103,000 students having already taken the course for credit.

In Florida, the ACLU has been attempting to block the Bible curriculum’s introduction into the Miami-Dade School District the nation’s fourth largest. However, NCBCPS has been making Floridians aware of the types of cases the ACLU prosecutes. Apparently, they’ve struck a nerve, because the ACLU has now hired a lobbyist to hinder the Bible course’s introduction into the schools. Bu the NCBCPS has the United Teachers of Dade Christians for Morality Caucus on its side. They have gathered more then 10,000 signatures on a petition. “The UTD would appreciate help with this campaign from anyone living in the Miami/Dade County area,” comments Ridenour. “They can be contacted at 305-213-7729, or at their Web site, www.utdcfmc.org.

“It’s Interesting that the ACLU is opposing our elective Bible course, but they don’t say anything about the mandatory readings on Islam at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill,” Ridenour observes. Recently, two taxpayers who are board members of the Family Policy Network, an AFA affiliate, joined three students in suing the state university. The lawsuit, which was filed by the CLP, asserts that requiring students to read an listen on CD to passage of the Quran, and then discuss how their opinions about the Islamic religion have changed as a result of those actions, violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.

“If this was a mandatory requirement for students to read the Bible,” reflects Steve Crampton, “ACLU lawyers would be parachuting in to file lawsuits. As it is, they are nowhere to be found.”

Ridenour says the Bible curriculum project is snowballing so quickly, it is a challenge to keep up. “But we’re forging ahead, and thrilled to do so. We’re working on a major youth networking project called ‘Youth Revolution.’ We want youth networks around the country to call and link up with us so students can easily download information from our Web site.”

Crampton expressed excitement about the project’s positive momentum, but issued a word of caution as well. “I would like to emphasize that the success of this project depends on ordinary citizens who will come forward and shepherd the curriculum through their schools board. It is a fairly easy process. We can’t do it from afar; it has to be implemented by the people who live I a particular school district. We work with them step-by-step along the way. If we don’t have their support, we’re dead in the water.”

Crampton added that as more school boards vote to include the Bible curriculum, the amount of funds needed for defending any potential lawsuits will increase dramatically. “We would deeply appreciate any financial help that our AFA supporters and others can give toward this project. We feel its success it imperative for the tomorrows of our children.”

Well the stipulation in this rectification of bible being taught in public schools, as it was for years up until the late 1800's to early 1900's.

If you haven't already, read the proposed purpose behind this article, by going to the link provided.
The stipulation would be that we go back to teaching children the same education our founding fathers would've had. Granted back then the average American, new colonial family held their own bible study, with dad being the head of the household.
Back then it would've been very common for the average boy or girl, to know their scriptures before going on to college.

Even today or I believe today, Yale, Harvard, and Oxford still put the Bible in curriculum as a staple to America's Foundation.

So if the bible was placed back into the school system as a curriculum, no other book would/should be given credence to this same honor. Seeing that they weren't apart of the Education that backed America to be where she is today.

The Bible As Literature? One keeps thinking of the magnificient abridgement of the King James Bible by Ernest Sutherland Bates that cut out the extraneous and boring parts so you could enjoy the text of a cherished classic as living literature. And it was designed to be so read. There is a case to made for reading the King James as part of the canon of literature if only for sheer beauty of the magnificent writing. As Bates himself noted, its probably the only beautiful thing produced by a committee in history. The ACLU can't very well object to students reading The Bible in public schools either for literature or in the context of a comparative religious studies class.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.