To: Gang of Five; SamAdams76
That's funny - I didn't see it mentioned anywhere that the foam that broke off was the new environmentally friendly stuff that doesn't harm the ozone layer like the foam we used to use.
8 posted on
01/27/2004 1:27:45 PM PST by
Wumpus Hunter
(<a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com" target="_blank">miserable failure)
To: Wumpus Hunter
Exactly. The foam formula was changed to be eco-friendly and after that NASA began experiencing problems with foam breaking off. This was not the first time - NASA knew there was a problem with the foam. This article avoids the root cause of the disaster because it's not p.c.
10 posted on
01/27/2004 1:43:46 PM PST by
colorado tanker
("There are but two parties now, Traitors and Patriots")
To: Wumpus Hunter
The foam is the problem!
It is directly related to the freon scam, that's why it will be buried.
To shed any light on it will uncover that r-12 products are better and safer than r134 products.
R-12 is still the most modern freon, r134 was developed years before r12 & shelved because it was corrosive and less efficient than r-12.
18 posted on
01/27/2004 2:27:30 PM PST by
norraad
("What light!">Blues Brothers)
To: Wumpus Hunter
That's funny - I didn't see it mentioned anywhere that the foam that broke off was the new environmentally friendly stuff that doesn't harm the ozone layer like the foam we used to use. It wasn't widely discussed in the media, but it was discussed on FR. It was also noted that NASA had been granted a waiver about a year or so before the accident, but that no one produced the material any more.
20 posted on
01/27/2004 3:18:32 PM PST by
lepton
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson