1 posted on
01/25/2004 2:16:42 PM PST by
Pokey78
To: Pokey78
Photos of Babes
To: Pokey78
Babes against Bush? Don't they know?
babes = bush
3 posted on
01/25/2004 2:22:09 PM PST by
Keith
(IT'S ABOUT THE JUDGES)
To: Pokey78
Just out of curiosity, if it's Babes Against Bush, why is their spokesman male? Femminazis (and girly-men) against Bush?
4 posted on
01/25/2004 2:23:07 PM PST by
AntiKev
(Pilots take no special joy in walking. Pilots like flying. - Neil Armstrong)
To: Pokey78
10 posted on
01/25/2004 2:42:31 PM PST by
Capitalism2003
(Got principles? http://www.LP.org)
To: Pokey78
Both sides have plans for the profits. BabesFor will give it to the Bush re-election campaign. Livingstone's group is starting a Web page to urge Democrats to vote in the fall. Why do I find this funny?
To: Pokey78
Did ANY of you guys READ this?
it's "Babes FOR Bush"
Tia
15 posted on
01/25/2004 3:13:20 PM PST by
tiamat
("Just a Bronze-Age Gal, Trapped in a Techno World!")
To: Pokey78
And on that note...
26 posted on
01/25/2004 3:59:11 PM PST by
Prime Choice
(Americans are a spiritual people. We're happy to help members of al Qaeda meet God.)
To: Pokey78
The first sentence indicates Bush is having these girls strip to somehow 'lift' his campaign. But it appears they're on their own. What gives?
29 posted on
01/25/2004 5:14:42 PM PST by
gitmo
(Who is John Galt?)
To: Pokey78
32 posted on
01/25/2004 5:40:32 PM PST by
Textide
To: Pokey78
bump
33 posted on
01/25/2004 5:49:46 PM PST by
Professional Engineer
(So, Spirit turns to Beagle and says, "Hold my beer and watch this")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
