[NorCoGOP]

Gee, if only PROOF were needed for his arguments, besides the "it feels good to rant and give out claims with no evidence to back them up" mentality, he'd have a chance of convincing somebody.

[Eala]

If we think back to last year, when the sitting president was eagerly selling the war to a reluctant American public

How about we extend our thinking a bit further and recall a few Democrat quotes on Iraq weapons of mass destruction, hmmmmm?

[erasmus605]

On the most simplistic level (which is how most Americans think of politics), one could imagine that capturing Saddam is a significant victory in the "war on terror." But like most issues, the real matter is a little more complicated.

This is also deserves an "elitist" alert.

[erasmus605]

our primary justification for invading Iraq was that it posed an imminent threat to our country in the form of Iraqi weapons of mass destruction and Saddam's ties to terrorist organizations. The anti-war coalition has been all but been proven right in refuting these two counts...

Wow, I guess all of those terrorists we've been finding in Iraq must just be there on vacation? Nice how the author just ignores any facts that are inconvienient.

[SpinyNorman]

The increasingly anxious anti-Howard Dean cabal went apoplectic when he dared to caution Americans that Hussein's capture "does not make America any safer." With some basic analysis, it's clear he's right.

Hussein's capture made us a lot safer than the election of a Howie Dean to the presidency would.

It seems like the Iowa "anti Dean cabal" Democrats agree. Howie's "we won by being third" speech, sleeves rolled up and all, seemed demonstrably more "apoplectic" than anything any Republican "cabal" have done. Just listen to his hysterical screech at the end of the litany of states he plans to conquer.