[11B3]

As usual on any Hillary thread, well, my tagline says it well enough.

[mrtysmm]

The assumption in this article is that Hitlery will run for prez in '04. Can it also be assumed that Clark is going to be the VP to balance her ticket? Interesting,,,but...I don't think the dwarves are going to just hand the nomination over to her without a fight. Furthermore, I don't think she can beat Bush no matter who's on the ticket with her, but, ok..."bring it on"!

[Quilla]

By now you should be able to understand all the confusion that surrounds this Democratic primary season, but what you may not see, is just why the confusion is so clear to someone like me.

The confusion has great clarity if you understand that the Clintons are making sure that all of the candidates are so confused that in the end the only clear choice to beat George Bush in 2004 is Hillary Clinton.

With all due respect to Mr. Nichols, I don't see how the Clintons can be responsible for the "confusion" created in this primary. They have had nothing to do with the numerous flip-flops of position, blatant lies, and strange views of Dean, Kerry, and the other long-time democrats. If the writer's premise is to hold true, then why would the Clinton puppet, Clark, make so many of the same mistakes and add to the confusion?

[onyx]

If Hitlery is running, she'd best start gathering delegates 'cause the days of the smoky backrooms are history. He who has the committed delegates wins. Nominating conventions are so pitifully boring that the VP selection is the only surprise... sometimes.