[BigSkyFreeper]

Yep, let's fragment the party into 6 pieces and put Howard Dean in the White House this November. /sarcasm

Personally, the energy is best spent putting Conservative members of Congress in place, to get Bush onto a more Conservative agenda.

[jgrubbs]

Personally, the energy is best spent putting Conservative members of Congress in place, to get Bush onto a more Conservative agenda.

Bush ignores the few Conservative members of Congress that are there, just ask Ron Paul. If Bush wanted a Conservative agenda he would pursue one, but he doesn't because he is not a real Conservative.

[Columbine]

Personally, the energy is best spent putting Conservative members of Congress in place, to get Bush onto a more Conservative agenda.

Exactly!

Some of these folks who come around trying to split the Republicans are straight out of DU.

[jimkress]

Yep, let's fragment the party into 6 pieces and put Howard Dean in the White House this November. /sarcasm

You won't see much difference from what's there today.

The only difference between the Republicans and the Democrats is that the Democrats want the US ruled by a combination of national and international despots while the Republicans will settle for tyranny by just national despots. The end result is the same - the destruction of our freedom.

Given the objectives of both parties are the same, how can anyone justify supporting either party?

Save America from the tyranny of Republican/Democrat hegemony. Support the Constitution Party.

[ItisaReligionofPeace]

You are right on Congress, however, the administration needs to get back in line.

[normy]

Personally, the energy is best spent putting Conservative members of Congress in place, to get Bush onto a more Conservative agenda

Exactly! That is what these guys were voted in for. Does anyone out there think during Bush's second term(if it happens) he will not right the Supreme Court when given the opportunity? Does anyone think he will not install conservitive judges wherever he can?

I think everyone knows he will be more conservitive in the next four years and in the mean time the Republicans will gain a serious hold on both houses of Congress basically stopping liberal Presidents for years to come. Not only that but from the pols I have seen America is embracing its conservitive roots.

Give Bush a second term and we will win the next quarter century. Not only that but because conservitive principles work it will be hard for people to deny they do.

[quantim]

Personally, the energy is best spent putting Conservative members of Congress in place, to get Bush onto a more Conservative agenda.

I see it opposite but generally agree.  A Constitution Party has no real chance anytime soon to win a general election.  But they sure as heck could start smacking around some wimpy Republicans and all Dems to straighten them out.  I think a real strong president (like Reagan) can have more influence on who is elected in congress rather then the other way around.

[eskimo]

Personally, the energy is best spent putting Conservative members of Congress in place, to get Bush onto a more Conservative agenda.

How is that to be done if the national GOP uses all its influence to discourage conservative candidates.

[sauropod]

Sure! He'll listen. /sarc

[wingnuts'nbolts]

Bingo! A whole lot of bluster goin' on!

[stocksthatgoup]

So is howard dean evidence of left wing groups leaving the Democratic party leadership?